LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Tuesday, May 23, 2023


The House met at 1:30 p.m.

Madam Speaker: Good afternoon, everybody. Please be seated.

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

Introduction of Bills

Bill 41–The Occupiers' Liability Amendment Act

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the Minister of Health (Ms. Gordon), that Bill 41, The Occupiers' Liability Amend­ment Act, be now read for a first time.

Motion presented.

Mr. Goertzen: This bill contains amend­ments that will modernize The Occupiers' Liability Act to ensure that occupiers receive timely notice of a personal injury claim related to snow or ice on private property. This will ensure that the issue can be remedied quickly to prevent further injury from somebody who's also entering that parti­cular property.

Madam Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Agreed? [Agreed]

      Further intro­duction of bills?

Bill 43–The Provincial Offences Amendment Act (2)

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move, seconded by the minister of Indigenous affairs, recon­ciliation and northern relations, that Bill 43, the prov­incial offences amend­ment act, be now read for a first time.

Madam Speaker: It has been moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Justice, seconded by the hon­our­able minister for Indigenous recon­ciliation and northern affairs, that Bill 43, The Prov­incial Offences Amend­ment Act (2), be now read a first time.

Mr. Goertzen: This bill contains amend­ments to The Prov­incial Offences Act that will enable First Nations to have contraventions of First Nations laws dealt with under the act. These amend­ments have been requested by MKO and on behalf of the 26 northern First Nations. In parti­cular, MKO has identified the need for the extension of the ticketing regime in The Prov­incial Offences Act to First Nations laws to make en­force­ment more efficient, which will also effectively enhance and support compliance and public safety in First Nations com­mu­nities.

      And I want to thank and welcome repre­sen­tatives from MKO who have joined us here this morning–this afternoon.

Madam Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Agreed? [Agreed]

      Com­mit­tee reports? Tabling of reports?

Ministerial Statements

Madam Speaker: The honourable Minister for Sport, Culture and Heritage, and I would indicate that the required 90 minutes' notice prior to routine pro­ceedings was provided in accordance with rule 27(2).

      Would the honourable minister please proceed with his statement.

Khalsa Aid Food Drive

Hon. Obby Khan (Minister of Sport, Culture and Heritage): Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize the hard work of Khalsa Aid Manitoba and Sikh Heritage Manitoba.

      In honour of Sikh Heritage Month in April, Khalsa Aid Manitoba and Sikh Heritage Manitoba partnered up to donate 10,000 pounds of food to food banks across Winnipeg and Steinbach.

      Stewardship and guidance are core principles of Sikhism. This is reflected in the core value of self­lessness service, known as Seva. The Khalsa food drive initiative demonstrates that members of the Sikh community in Manitoba are committed to providing aid to those in need. This dedication to com­mu­nity building aligns with core values that unite all Manitobans.

      The Khalsa food drive initiative went on to collect over 10,000 pounds–nearly 11,000 pounds of food. My colleagues and I were proud to contribute with a pickup truck full of food to donate to this worthy cause. The food was distributed to Bear Clan Patrol, Helping Hands Steinbach food bank, Main Street Project and Harvest Manitoba.

      Sikhs living in our province continue to con­tribute to our communities in many ways. With over 35,000 Manitoba residents identifying as Sikh, the   community continues to grow and enrich Manitoba every single day.

      Our province is proud to celebrate the many people that call Manitoba home. By welcoming diversity and working together, we ensure our collective success. Diversity is our province's greatest strength, and we are stronger together, and the hard work of Khalsa Aid Manitoba and Sikh Heritage Manitoba is a shining example of this.

      Madam Speaker, as we recognize the contri­butions of Khalsa food aid drive, I extend my warmest regards to the Sikh community for their continued support to make Manitoba better.

      Madam Speaker, I would also like to ask for leave to table the names of all the wonderful volunteers from Khalsa Aid and Sikh–Manitoba who contributed to the success of this project, and I ask that–all my colleagues to welcome those from Khalsa Aid Manitoba and Sikh Heritage Manitoba who con­tri­bu­ted to the success of this project.

      And I ask that–all my colleagues to welcome those from Khalsa Aid Manitoba and Sikh Heritage Manitoba who have joined us here today, and they've just showed up now.

      Thank you all so much for your continued work and making Manitoba better.

Madam Speaker: The hon­our­able member for Burrows–oh.

      Pardon me, I'll just revert back. Is there leave to include the names in Hansard? [Agreed]

Khalsa Aid volunteers: Varinder Kaur Ghuman, director, Winnipeg chapter; Gurcharan Singh Bhaini, Harjinder Kaur Brar, Jujar Singh Brar, Rupinder Kaur Brar, Gurpreet Singh Deol, Kuljit Singh Ghuman, Prabhjot Singh Ghuman, Ajaypratap Singh Gill, Gurpreet Singh Gill, Rajbir Kaur Gill, Sarbjit Singh Gill, Bhupinder Kaur Grewal, Parminder Kaur Grewal, Sher Singh Grewal, Hartej Singh, Maildeep Singh Toor

Sikh Heritage Manitoba volunteers: Parminder Singh Gill, president; Guruch Singh Buttar, Gurpreet Singh Deol, Jasmine Kaur Dhalla, Mahekleen Kaur Gill, Navraj Singh Gill, Anmol Singh Gumber, Kiratveer Singh Hayer, Gurkirat Singh Nagpal, Gurmehar Singh Nagpal, Baldev Singh Ramgotra, Nimmi Ramgotra, Esha Kaur Rooprai, Subhdeep Singh Sidhu

Mr. Diljeet Brar (Burrows): Madam Speaker, the Khalsa Aid Manitoba has emerged as a beacon of hope, compas­sion and community empowerment. With a relentless commitment to serving those in need, this initiative has gained recognition for its remarkable efforts in combating food insecurity and fostering a sense of togetherness among diverse populations.

      Khalsa Aid, a UK-based 'humitarian' organization rooted in Sikh principles of selfless service, extended its reach to Manitoba with a mission to alleviate hunger and provide relief to vulnerable communities. The food drive in Manitoba embodies the organiz­ation's core values of recognize the whole human race as one and dedication to serving humanity by organizing events and initiatives that address food scarcity and support those facing difficult circum­stances.

      The Khalsa Aid food drive, organized by Khalsa Aid and Sikh Heritage Manitoba, has fostered col­laboration between volunteers, local businesses and community members. Through partnerships with local food banks such as Winnipeg Harvest, shelters and community organizations such as Main Street Project, the initiative has created a robust network of support. The food drive engages volunteers from all walks of life, breaking down barriers and uniting people in the common purpose of eradicating hunger and ensuring everyone has access to nutritious meals.

      Through an extensive outreach program, the Khalsa Aid food drive and the Sikh community have made a positive impact on Manitoba through dis­tributing food, organizing fundraisers and holding awareness campaigns to combat food insecurity. These initiatives have offered relief to individuals and families facing economic hardships and actively empower them by helping to meet their basic needs and restore their dignity.

      The Khalsa Aid food drive in Manitoba stands as a shine example of community empowerment, com­passion and unity. Through its unwavering commit­ment–

Madam Speaker: The member's time has expired.

      Is there leave to allow the member to complete his statement? [Agreed]

Mr. Brar: Through its unwavering commit­ment to eradicating food insecurity, the initiative has not only provided relief but has also fostered a strong sense of belonging and hope for a brighter future.

      Thank you, Madam Speaker.

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): I ask leave to speak to the minister's statement.

Madam Speaker: Does the member have leave to speak to the min­is­terial statement? [Agreed]

Mr. Gerrard: Khalsa Aid is a global movement as well as a local movement. It provides phenomenal support not just here in Winnipeg but around the world, and parti­cularly in areas where there's food emergencies. It recognizes the Sikh tradition that the whole human race is one and that everybody needs a chance, and those who are less fortunate need help and, parti­cularly, food.

      I understand in the Golden Temple in India that food is available for those who need it 24-7. It's just one small example.

      But what is happening here in Winnipeg, in Manitoba, is in­cred­ible. We are extremely thankful for all your efforts to raise food, this in­cred­ible food drive. It is–you are a com­mu­nity which really looks out for others and does tre­men­dous things for all of Winnipeg.

      Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Members' Statements

John Taylor Collegiate

Hon. Scott Johnston (Minister of Seniors and Long-Term Care): Today I rise with a great pleasure and pride to recognize the significant accom­plish­ments of the students and staff at John Taylor Collegiate in my constituency of Assiniboia.

      John Taylor students and staff have heightened awareness of the value of stem cell and blood donations. They ex­per­ienced first and–first-hand the deterioration of a fellow classmate as she battled aplastic anemia, a rare, life-threatening bone-marrow-failure disease.

      Madison Claven-Enns had battled the disease for seven years with multiple drug therapy treatments and two bone marrow transplants. It was Madison's hope to graduate and receive her diploma.

* (13:40)

      In true Piper passion, this high school rallied in support and came together for a blood donor drive and stem cell clinic, which has helped bring forward the treatment of so many–80 diseases and disorders that require stem cell transplants.

      Sadly, our community lost Madison just two weeks after receiving her high school diploma, but her legacy lives on at John Taylor Collegiate.

      Now, annually, the Madison Claven-Enns memorial blood donor drive continues and students have learning dis­abil­ities–in tissue and organ dona­tions, which these gallant students help.

      In the gallery today we have biology teacher Sara [phonetic] Shepherd; student repre­sen­tatives Juan Pedri [phonetic], Becky Imasuen, Jayme Fickes; and Kristine [phonetic] McFee from the Canadian Blood Services.

      Madam Speaker, I ask that my colleagues join me in recognizing the selfless and heartfelt efforts of the students and staff of John Taylor Collegiate in the memory and inspiration of Madison Claven­-Enns.

MACY Report Recommendations

Mrs. Bernadette Smith (Point Douglas): Last year, the Manitoba advocate for children youth–child and youth released a special report on the government's compliance with their recommendations. Unfortu­nately, they found that only 12 of the 67 recom­men­dations were complete. On recommendations related to mental health and addictions, nearly half had not been completed.

      Earlier this year, the advocate had also raised concerns about how youth are being discharged without a plan to address the full scope of their mental health needs, including families struggling to navigate systems and provide care to their children without support. In some communities, mental health services and resources are not even available.

      Mental health resources for youth have been scarce for years, and the impact of the pandemic has only made it worse. This is particularly true in rural and northern communities. Sadly, we know that one result of this is the crisis of youth suicide in our province.

      The government's lack of action to provide adequate resources and supports for youth in Manitoba is an irresponsible failure and is costing lives. And the crisis of youth mental health is only growing. In 2021 and 2022 year alone, the advocate's office received nearly 3,000 requests for services, and 59 per cent of the young people they served were experiencing mental health and substance abuse issues.

      Our youth deserve better. They deserve to have resources and supports they need to grow and thrive, regardless of where they live or what challenges they've experienced.

      To everyone who works on the front lines preventing–providing mental health care to youth, I want to thank you for the incredible heart­–work that you all do.

      To those youth who are struggling with their mental health, know we see you, we support you, we love you and you are not alone.

Election Campaigning

Mr. Shannon Martin (McPhillips): Madam Speaker, spring has sprung and with it we see the usual grass greening, flowers blooming and, of course, politicians door knocking. There is no better avenue to connect with constituents than through door knocking.

      With this in mind, the NDP–spe­cific­ally, the MLA for Fort Garry–has been out and about offering their three-point plan. So, lets review what their commit­ments should be, if they formed a gov­ern­ment.

      Firstly, they are promising Manitoba Public Insurance rebates, despite their leader calling previous MPI rebates, and I quote, not the most effective way to reach people. End quote.

      And despite decrying the financial foundation of MPI almost daily, they want to dip into reserves to lubricate their voters. With this so-called commit­ment, the NDP are making their disdain and hostility to the Public Utilities Board public.

      Secondly, the MLA for Fort Garry is knocking on doors telling Manitobans that an NDP government will somehow lower grocery prices through regu­lations. This commitment reinforces just how to touch the NDP are in terms of actually running a lemonade stand, much less a grocery–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Martin: –store. How many grocers, who are already surviving on razor-thin margins along with assortment–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Martin: –of additional expenses, were actually spoken to about this commitment? I can answer: zero. For the NDP, apparently, running even more small grocers out of business, creating more food deserts and less options for consumers is how they will address the affordability crisis.

      Finally, according to the MLA for Fort Garry, and I quote: newcomers will make us all wealthy. How very offensive and typical of the NDP. They have no interest in actually breaking a sweat and building our economy. Instead, it appears that the NDP have ripped a page from the Simpsons, when Homer ran for office on the mantra, can't someone else do that? That, Madam Speaker, is the epitome of laziness and colonialism.

      We on this side of the–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Martin: –House work with newcomers to ensure their success while the NDP MLA for Fort Garry insists that newcomers only exist for his success.

      Thank you.

* * *

Mr. Dougald Lamont (St. Boniface): Madam Speaker, it's been a tough time in the mineral sector in Manitoba for a few years now, and we need to talk about how important it is to engage with and respect all Manitobans because of the–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Lamont: –enormous potential for resource development of critical minerals–

Madam Speaker: Order, please. I'll call the member to order.

      I would point out we haven't always followed the order that's on the papers. Many people have stood up at different times. If you want to do it today, then I would apologize to the member for St. Boniface and recog­nize the hon­our­able member for Transcona.

Jason Butchart

Mr. Nello Altomare (Transcona): Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to a Manitoban–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Altomare: –who was raised in Transcona and whose story was in the news recently. His name is Jason Butchart.

      On Wednesday, May 10th, Jason passed away while driving back to his job at Percy E. Moore Hospital in Hodgson, Manitoba, where he worked as registered nurse, after fulfilling his duty as a volunteer firefighter that very same day.

      Jason had been on call as a volunteer firefighter for the RM of Fisher. He was the first responder to reach the scene of a car accident that occurred on Highway 68.

      With the help of his fellow volunteer firefighters, Jason provided medical treatment to the injured, which included an infant who was 10 months old. As always, due to his experience as an RN, Jason was a calming presence while they waited for the para­medics and STARS ambulance to arrive.

      Jason was 54 years old.

      Jason spent time in the military, loved motor­cycles and played the bagpipes.

      On behalf of all Manitobans, I want to thank Jason for his commitment to his duty, his dedication to being there when we needed him most.

      I want to express my appreciation to all volunteer firefighters in Manitoba. Many RMs rely on indivi­duals like Jason who take the time out of their busy lives to volunteer, to receive training and make themselves available and alert for those unexpected moments when we are in danger and distress.

      While we grieve for Jason and his family, we also want to provide them with support, just like Jason selflessly provided support to others when they needed it most.

      Today in the gallery, Madam Speaker, I have his mom, Mary; his father, Ken; and his sister, Michelle.

      In closing, Madam Speaker, I ask for the indul­gence of you and members of the Manitoba Legislative Assembly for a moment of silence to honour the memory, the work and the life of Jason Butchart.

Madam Speaker: Is there leave for a moment of silence? [Agreed]

      Please rise.

A moment of silence was observed.

* (13:50)

Mineral Industry and Economic Reconciliation

Mr. Dougald Lamont (St. Boniface): It's been a tough time in the mineral sector in Manitoba for a few years now, and we need to talk about how important it is to engage with and respect all Manitobans because of the enormous potential for the resource dev­elop­ment, especial of critical minerals.

      To achieve our potential for shared economic growth, we have to rebuild trust, capacity and infrastructure to make it happen. If we do, we can not only create jobs and long‑term prosperity, but Manitoba's minerals can play a role in moving to a greener economy that's less reliant on fuel and energy that we as Manitobans pay billions of dollars to import.

      In particular, we have to be willing to show respect to First Nations in their say, over their territory, and work with them in partnership. I will say that attempts to do this have been tried and failed for too–far too long.

      I'll just give one example dating back to 1970. Métis leader Jean Allard was a new member of the Manitoba Legislature and legislative assistant to Premier Schreyer. He was given the special respon­sibility in the new NDP gov­ern­ment then for develop­ing innovative job programs for people in northern Manitoba, about 90 per cent of them Indigenous.

      With the support of the then Manitoba Indian Brotherhood, the Manitoba Métis Federation, mining interests and unions, Allard worked hard to pull together a new commuter flight service in the North that would allow Indigenous men to fly in and out of a newly opened mine operation on a two‑week cycle so they could earn good money and still remain in their home communities. But just as the new program was about to be announced, the NDP caucus pulled the plug and decided instead the government would build a brand new town from scratch in the wilderness near the mine.

      Allard was furious. He had spent two years arm-twisting stakeholders and fellow legislators, only to see his plans for developing a regular income stream that would suit Indigenous people thwarted. He eruptly and bitterly quit the NDP in April 1972 and sat as an independent.

      That is the kind of partnership that we've seen lost and needs to be regained, along with a commitment to environmental restoration and mitigation, all as part of economic reconciliation.

      As for the Progressive Conservatives, as I once asked Brian Pallister, why is it that the Saskatchewan prospector says it'll take 250 years at the current rate to have a sus­tain­able mining industry in Manitoba?

      Indigenous participation and ownership of these resources is critical to our capacity to grow and maintain new wealth in Manitoba. I look forward to seeing more of it.

      Thank you, Madam Speaker.

Introduction of Guests

Madam Speaker: Prior to oral questions, we have some guests in the gallery that I would like to intro­duce to you. We have seated in the public gallery from École Selkirk Junior High 80 grade 9 students under the direction of Joan Cooney. And this group is located in the con­stit­uency of the hon­our­able member for Selkirk (Mr. Lagimodiere).

      On behalf of all hon­our­able members here, we welcome you to the Manitoba Legislature.

Oral Questions

Manitoba Public Insurance–Project Nova
Cost Overruns and Autopac Rates

Mr. Wab Kinew (Leader of the Official Opposition): Madam Speaker, the PCs have caused the crisis at Manitoba Public Insurance. The respon­si­bility lies with them. They are the ones who are supposed to be the stewards of MPI, and it's costing Manitobans money. Every Manitoban now has to pay more on their Autopac premiums.

      Now, new infor­ma­tion now shows when the PCs became aware of the problems at MPI–I'll table them–it shows that the PC gov­ern­ment became aware of the $200‑million cost overrun at MPI two years ago, in the summer of 2021. And yet, the Premier has done almost nothing for two years.

      Will the Premier tell the House why, for two years, her gov­ern­ment let Project Nova go $200 million over budget?

Hon. Heather Stefanson (Premier): See, the Leader of the Op­posi­tion knows that when the NDP was in gov­ern­ment, that they didn't actually put in a new IT system or oversee that at Manitoba Public Insurance. So, we continue to clean up the mess of the previous NDP gov­ern­ment, Madam Speaker. It's im­por­tant that we move forward with those projects.

      But what I will say, Madam Speaker, is that I do want to welcome our new board chair, Ward Keith, to his role as the chair of Manitoba Public Insurance. I also want to welcome the new interim CEO, Marnie Kacher, at Public Insurance.

      Clearly things are moving forward in the right direction, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: The honourable Leader of the Official Opposition, on a supplementary question.

Mr. Kinew: Madam Speaker, I don't think Manitobans believe things are going forward in a good direction, when the PCs have overseen a cost overrun of $200 million and is forcing Manitobans to pay more on their Autopac rates starting this past April 1st.

      Now, of course, the Premier does acknowl­edge that there's been chaos at the top of MPI. They had to let go, first, the chair of the board; now they had to let go of the CEO. This is an absolute mess, and it's not an internal mess like we usually from–see from the PCs. It's a mess that's costing the people of Manitoba money: busi­ness owners who have to deliver trans­por­tation, consumers–the average Manitoban who needs to commute in order to get to work.

      Will the Premier tell the House why she author­ized all of the mistakes that have cost Manitobans so much money on their Autopac premiums?

Mrs. Stefanson: Madam Speaker, certainly Manitobans should know that when–while we're continuing to clean up the mess of the previous NDP gov­ern­ment when it comes to Manitoban Public Insurance, at this time we know and recog­nize that there's no financial concerns at MPI. In fact, financials are strong, as we understand.

      And I will also say for the record, because the Leader of the Op­posi­tion won't, that there were two rebate cheques that were given out to Manitoba Public Insurance ratepayers, Madam Speaker. And that was done under our watch, not theirs, where they jacked up fees for MPI clients.

Madam Speaker: The honourable Leader of the Official Opposition, on a final supplementary.

McKinsey Consultants–Payment for Services

Mr. Kinew: Madam Speaker, it strains belief to hear the Province say there are no financial concerns at MPI when Project Nova is $200 million over budget. That's money that the people of Manitoba should have been getting reduced rates on this year, but instead they have to–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Kinew: –pay more because of their mismanage­ment.

      Now, the financial concerns at MPI, they go beyond the $200 million cost overrun and they include the $12‑million untendered contract that was paid out to McKinsey. We've asked questions–very serious concerns brought up about this consulting firm and their activities not just in Manitoba but across the country.

      And yet, the Premier insists on signing off and ensuring that McKinsey gets paid.

      Will the Premier tell the House just how much money is being paid to McKinsey in the end for the work that they may not have even done on Project Nova?

Mrs. Stefanson: While we continue to clean up the mess of the NDP gov­ern­ment, Madam Speaker, we want to ensure that there's an IT system at Manitoba Public Insurance that's there for those ratepayers, for Manitoba Public Insurance clients.

      And so, we'll continue to move forward on that, as I understand that the financials are sound. Of course, we're looking at the overall financials of Manitoba Public Insurance, to make sure that they are sound. That is our concern.

      And I will say to Manitobans that the fear mongering by the NDP is unwarranted at this time. We recog­nize that the financials are stable, and that is the im­por­tant thing here.

      The im­por­tant thing here is that we have given record payments out to Manitoba Public Insurance clients under our watch; two rebate cheques, Madam Speaker. We gave money back to Manitobans when it was ap­pro­priate to do so, as we understand that we're moving forward in the right direction with MPI.

Madam Speaker: The hon­our­able Leader of the Official Op­posi­tion, on a new question.

Health-Care Services
Contract with Private Clinic

Mr. Wab Kinew (Leader of the Official Opposition): Madam Speaker, before we move on, let's just make sure that the situation at MPI–let's just make sure people understand the situation at MPI is an absolute mess and it was created entirely under the PCs' time in office.

      Another area where they've made a complete mess of things, and everyone in Manitoba knows this, is in our health-care system. In fact, just within the past number of weeks, they've turned around and rejected proposals from surgeons at the Grace who wanted to invest in our public system. They've turned around and attacked physicians who've spoken out publicly with recom­men­dations for how to improve public health care in Manitoba.

      And why did they do that? Well, we now know it's because they went and signed a private contract with the Cambie medical centre out of British Columbia. For those who don't know, this is one of the leading proponents of priva­tiza­tion of health care in Canada. They tried to go to the Supreme Court–this clinic did–to attack the Canada Health Act, which guarantees uni­ver­sal coverage for all Canadians.

      Is the Premier trying to fund the Cambie clinic's next court challenge with this contract?

* (14:00)

Hon. Heather Stefanson (Premier): The Leader of the Op­posi­tion is all over the map with his questions.

      He started off with MPI, and I feel obliged to correct the record, Madam Speaker. The Leader of the Op­posi­tion knows that when the NDP gov­ern­ment was in power, they did nothing to upgrade their IT system–absolutely nothing.

      What we did is we took action when we got into gov­ern­ment to make sure that there is an IT system there for Manitoba Public Insurance, Madam Speaker, and we'll continue to move forward to ensure that that job gets done.

Madam Speaker: The hon­our­able Leader of the Official Op­posi­tion, on a sup­ple­mentary question.

Mr. Kinew: Well, it seems like the Premier doesn't want to talk about health care, and who can blame her? After being Brian Pallister's failed Health minister and we saw such terrible out­comes during the pandemic, now she's imple­men­ting a priva­tiza­tion agenda.

      The thing that compounds the travesty here is that this PC gov­ern­ment–the Stefanson gov­ern­ment–is rejecting solutions from local doctors who are telling us how we could improve and increase capacity in our local public health-care system in com­mu­nities like Winnipeg, Selkirk, Brandon. And instead, they're signing contracts with private companies outside of Manitoba, including one that is trying to priva­tize health care across the country.

      Why is the Premier undermining public health care in Manitoba?

Mrs. Stefanson: Well, Madam Speaker, unlike the Leader of the Op­posi­tion and members of the NDP, we are focused on getting better results for patients. We won't take an ideological approach when it comes to ensuring that patients get the health care they need.

      And, Madam Speaker, I will point out to the Leader of the NDP that the NDP gov­ern­ment in British Columbia is also contracting out these ser­vices. Breast and prostate cancer patients are waiting for radiation. We'll have cross-border option.

      BC Cancer will start sending eligible breast and prostate cancer patients to Washington state for radiation treatments. Patients will be offered the choice of going to one of two clinics. They will be given choices.

      There's an NDP gov­ern­ment in BC, Madam Speaker, who understands the importance of getting their health-care services for Manitobans when they need it. In their case, for BC patients.

      The Leader of the Op­posi­tion and NDP don't get it in Manitoba.

      We will continue to do what's in the best interest of patients.

Some Honourable Members: Oh, oh.

Madam Speaker: Order.

      We have some young minds in the gallery that are very interested to learn how a demo­cratic debate works, so I would like to see them impressed by what they see here.

      The hon­our­able Leader of the Official Op­posi­tion, on a final sup­ple­mentary.

Mr. Kinew: You know, Madam Speaker, the Premier really is all over the map with that purported-to-be answer.

      But here's the thing: We're talking about the Cambie medical clinic. She's talking about a com­pletely different surgical arrangement.

      What we're talking about with the Cambie medical clinic–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Kinew: –is a company that tried to go to the Supreme Court of Canada to get public health care dismantled in this country.

      The PCs don't seem to understand that uni­ver­sal access to public health care is a fun­da­mental Canadian value. They've signed a contract, they've gone into busi­ness with a company that is trying to attack that fun­da­mental Canadian value.

      So I'll repeat the question: Is the Premier trying to fund this company's next court challenge against public health care in our country? [interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mrs. Stefanson: Madam Speaker, the Leader of the Op­posi­tion is so obsessed with ideology that he refuses to put patient care first.

      We will always put patient care first, as will, and I will note, the premier of British Columbia, Madam Speaker.

      And because the Leader of the Op­posi­tion per­haps hasn't seen this article, I'll table it for him today. But the article is entitled: Breast and prostate cancer patients waiting for radiation will have cross-border option.

      The BC gov­ern­ment even gets it, Madam Speaker, that it's more im­por­tant to put patient care ahead of their own ideology.

      We will always put patient care first in the province of Manitoba.

Health-Care Services
Contract With Private Clinic

MLA Uzoma Asagwara (Union Station): Instead of investing in our public health-care system, the Premier is yet again choosing to send money out of province to private, for-profit providers instead. And this time, the Premier has signed a deal with none other than Cambie surgical centre.

      For the last decade, Cambie's CEO has led the crusade against our public health-care system, even going so far as to bring this to the Supreme Court of Canada.

      On this side of the House, Madam Speaker, we don't think the gov­ern­ment should give money to providers who are actively fighting against public health care.

      Will the Premier simply admit that giving Cambie public dollars was her mistake?

Hon. Audrey Gordon (Minister of Health): Madam Speaker, I'd like to table again for the House the Winnipeg Free Press article, and continue to remind members of this Chamber what happened when the NDP tried and failed to run Manitoba's health-care system.

      The headline, Madam Speaker: NDP gets failing grade. Manitoba's NDP gov­ern­ment has broken more election promises than it has kept on the eve of the party's first year in office. Premier Gary Doer's team got its worst marks in the area of health care, where it made sweeping promises. After one year, the NDP gov­ern­ment has broken more than half of 20 top pledges.

      Manitobans couldn't trust them then, Madam Speaker, and they certainly can't trust them now.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for Union Station, on a supplementary question.

MLA Asagwara: For a decade, the CEO of Cambie surgical centre has been leading the charge against our public health-care system. He's re­peat­edly tried to argue in court that we should have an American-style, two-tier health system, and he's re­peat­edly lost, Madam Speaker.

      Despite his crusade against our public health-care system, the Premier (Mrs. Stefanson) thinks it's a good idea to send him public taxpayer money. On this side of the House, we think that's wrong.

      Will the Premier simply admit that paying a company that's argued against public health care–a system that the vast majority of Manitobans and Canadians depend on–is wrong?

Ms. Gordon: Madam Speaker, members opposite can feel free to read along in the article I tabled on some of the broken promises.

      I will list them: failed to end hallway medicine in six months; failed to open 100 hospital beds imme­diately; failed to reduce the wait-lists for diag­nos­tic testing; failed to imme­diately implement the nurses-first program; failed to end the practice of sending patients to Grafton, North Dakota; failed to cut the prostate cancer wait-list in half; and failed to esta­blish a com­pre­hen­sive–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Ms. Gordon: –cancer centre.

      Failed, failed, failed, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for Union Station, on a final supplementary.

MLA Asagwara: Madam Speaker, it's embarrassing that this Health Minister is failing–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

MLA Asagwara: –so badly at health care right now in 2023 that she is quoting an article from 23 years ago, instead of focusing on the fact that this Premier is excluding and ignoring solutions being brought forward by doctors right now here in Manitoba. [interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

MLA Asagwara: Cambie's CEO has spent the past decade attacking public health care across Canada. He's re­peat­edly tried to argue in court against public health care in our country. Thankfully, he's re­peat­edly lost, Madam Speaker.

      Can the Premier or the Health Minister explain why they're giving taxpayer dollars to a company that's trying to tear down our public health-care system?

Ms. Gordon: Madam Speaker, I'm sure the members opposite are wondering what the Manitoba Nurses Union president, Maureen Hancharyk, had to say about their NDP-managed health system.

      When talking about the nursing shortage during their gov­ern­ment, which nearly doubled in a single year under their watch, this is a direct quote: The vacancy rate is getting higher. I don't think anyone has any idea how bad it is out there.

* (14:10)

      That is their legacy, Madam Speaker. Broken promises–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Ms. Gordon: –no plan, no solutions. The NDP of yesterday is the same as the NDP of today.

Brandon School Board Meeting
Premier's Position on Book Bans

Ms. Lisa Naylor (Wolseley): Madam Speaker, in 2023, it should not be difficult for the leaders of this province to stand up and say that books should not be banned.

      But this Premier has refused to do so. Instead of unequivocally supporting the 2SLGBTQ+ com­mu­nity, she has said it should be up to school divisions to decide whether or not to protect Manitobans' human rights.

      School board trustees in Brandon will be hearing public pre­sen­ta­tions tonight, and Manitobans deserve a clear answer on where this Premier stands.

      Does she condemn banning books, yes or no?

Hon. Obby Khan (Minister of Sport, Culture and Heritage): I'm not sure how many more times, on this side of the House, we can say it. I myself have said it, the Premier has said it, the Minister of Edu­ca­tion has said it, the minister of status of women, now called GEM, has said it, we have all said it on this side of the House, that we condemn acts of violence and hate towards any com­mu­nity, especially targeted currently at the LGBT+ com­mu­nity.

      We've also said, on this side of the House, that there is no prov­incial book ban in this province.

      So, my questions for the members opposite: Why do they continue to put false infor­ma­tion on the record and cause more fear in Manitoba when we should all be coming together in unity to stand against book bans?

      We are not for book bans, and we stand against all acts of hate.

      Thank you, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: I am going to have to call the member for Point Douglas (Mrs. Smith) to order. I could not even hear the minister's ending of his statements.

      So, I'm going to please ask all members–[interjection] And I'm going to call the member for St. Johns (MLA Fontaine) to order now, too.

      I'm trying to maintain some decorum in here, and when I can't hear answers and I can't hear questions, then we have a problem.

      So, I'm going to ask for everybody's co‑operation, please.

Ms. Naylor: The question at hand here is whether the Premier (Mrs. Stefanson) will condemn banning books without qualifying her answer.

      Her record of disrespect speaks for itself. She was banned from speaking at Pride after disrespecting organizers by not showing up for them when she said she would. And even this morning, all the Premier would say about the situation in Brandon is that they're monitoring the situation.

      Well, the issue is coming–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Ms. Naylor: –before Brandon school trustees tonight, and Manitobans deserve an answer.

      Will the Premier condemn banning books today?

Mr. Khan: Madam Speaker, this is really sad and embar­rass­ing for the member from Wolseley.

      I was there myself, and I listened with my own two ears when our Premier stood up and said there is no book ban in the province of Manitoba, and she will not allow any book ban in province of Manitoba.

      I was there; I heard it, along were dozens of other–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Khan: –people.

      Now, the member of Wolseley wasn't there, but the member of Wolseley–and I will quote–on May 17th said, the PC gov­ern­ment needs to unequivocally speak out against book banning and condemn attacks on Riverbend. To do so is to fail support–the LGBT+ com­mu­nity.

      Madam Speaker, we have done that. We have done that over and over again. On May 16th, in Hansard, I said it. On May 16th, the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion said it. And today, our Premier said it.

      So, when will the members opposite stop fear mongering in Manitoba?

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for Wolseley, on a final supplementary.

Ms. Naylor: At no time has the Premier of Manitoba stood in these Chambers and said that book banning is wrong, and that is what we're asking for. [interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Ms. Naylor: School trustees are meeting tonight. This is not just a hypothetical, this is happening.

      Manitobans want a clear statement from the leader of the Province about what is happening. It matters to Manitobans.

      But the Premier still won't say the words that book banning is wrong. She needs to clearly condemn the banning of books, no ifs, ands or buts.

      Will she finally stand in–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Ms. Naylor: –this House and do so today?

Hon. Rochelle Squires (Minister respon­si­ble for Gender Equity): As the first minister in this prov­ince's history respon­si­ble for Gender Equity, it was such an honour this morning to be at an an­nounce­ment with the Premier esta­blish­ing this new enhanced man­date of the Manitoba gov­ern­ment to ensure equity and diversity in our province.

      And at this an­nounce­ment, our Premier was unequivocal, where there is no place for hate in our society, there is no place for book bans in our society.

      On this side of the House, we are very clear that there is no room for that in society, unlike members opposite, who have failed to apologize for homo­phobic comments that they have made on the record.

Edu­ca­tion System
Funding Concerns

Mr. Nello Altomare (Transcona): Instead of properly funding schools after years of cuts, this Premier (Mrs. Stefanson) has sent out a letter offering custom graduation videos. This makes the Premier's priorities abundantly 'clealer'–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Altomare: –Madam Speaker. She's more worried about campaigning to Manitoba students than sup­porting them in the classrooms.

      Students don't need an empty grad video, they need more teachers, more supports and more essential funding in their classrooms. The Premier should stop politicizing edu­ca­tion and fund it instead.

      Will she commit to doing so today? [interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Hon. Wayne Ewasko (Minister of Education and Early Childhood Learning): Once again, it gives me great pleasure to stand up and put some facts on the record, Madam Speaker.

      Madam Speaker, the member that represents Transcona, again, is talking from those self-serving talking points from his–from their–his leader. It's a bunch of fear mongering, fear that they're spreading all across this great province of Manitoba.

      Madam Speaker, $100 million this year alone to K‑to‑12 edu­ca­tion. That's a 6.1 per cent increase.

      In my next answer, I'll be talking about those wonderful graduations that are coming up for the K‑to‑12 system, Madam Speaker, so I ap­pre­ciate the member from Transcona standing up and asking me a question on this topic.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for Transcona, on a supplementary question.

Mr. Altomare: You know, they can't run on their record. It's been six and a half years of underfunding edu­ca­tion, 0.5 per cent every year. And now they think–now they think, Madam Speaker–that school divisions and school systems can turn on a dime when they get a couple of extra dollars.

      That is not possible, Madam Speaker. They know that, and that's also affecting–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Altomare: –recruiting and all the clinical sup­ports in class.

      But let's get back to the videos. It's clear the Premier is hoping to get re‑elected so that she can keep underfunding edu­ca­tion. We, of course, on this side of the House, think that's wrong.

      Can the Premier explain why she's putting her own needs ahead of Manitoba student needs?

Mr. Ewasko: It's nice that the member from Transcona stands up and admits and puts on the record that we are increasing funding to edu­ca­tion, Madam Speaker. Even though the member from Transcona and his NDP colleagues feel that $100 million is crumbs. Crumbs.

      Well, that $100 million is making sure that we have success for all students in Manitoba, Madam Speaker, no matter where they live, their cultural back­ground or their own personal circum­stance.

* (14:20)

      We're on the side of student success and funding edu­ca­tion, whereas the NDP are on the side of fear mongering all across this province, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for Transcona, on a final supplementary.

Mr. Altomare: The cumulative effect of under­funding isn't fear mongering. It's factual right now.

      There are school divisions that can't buy school buses because of the increased costs due to the pandemic and due to years, Madam Speaker, of underfunding by this gov­ern­ment. It's a cumulative effect, and they know it.

      And it's clear that these videos aren't going to meet the needs of students. She's made that abundantly clear over the past seven years as being of a government that has underfunded edu­ca­tion con­sistently, Madam Speaker.

      Will the Premier now simply admit that cutting edu­ca­tion has been wrong, and will put Manitoba students ahead of her own political aspirations?

Mr. Ewasko: The member from Transcona and his NDP colleagues are just plain wrong, Madam Speaker.

      Twenty­–23 per cent increase to education since we've taken office in 2016, Madam Speaker–23 per cent. That's not crumbs, as the member from Transcona continues to put on the record.

      It's unfor­tunate that they–[interjection]

Madam Speaker: Order.

Mr. Ewasko: –continue to vote against the $100‑million, 6.1 per cent increase this year alone in edu­cation.

      On that point, Madam Speaker, I would like to wish each and every graduate this coming–during June from high school, all the best in their future endeavours. And I know many of us in this great Chamber of ours are going to be attending those graduations.

      So, thank you, Madam Speaker, for your time.

Manitoba Hydro Rates
Increase Concerns

Mr. Adrien Sala (St. James): This PC gov­ern­ment's plan for Manitoba Hydro is clear: they want to raise rates as quickly as possible, regardless of whether or not hydro rate increases are actually needed.

      They've hiked up rates over 20 per cent since 2016, and now they want to do it again by 2.4 per cent in September and then another 2.4 per cent next April. These hikes put a massive burden on Manitoba families and small busi­nesses.

      The Canadian Federation of In­de­pen­dent Busi­ness wrote a letter to the minister asking him to cancel his rate hike.

      Will he listen, and will he commit to stopping the PC gov­ern­ment's rate hikes today?

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister responsible for Manitoba Hydro): Well, Madam Speaker, I think Manitobans should ap­pre­ciate the situation the NDP left Manitoba Hydro in.

      In fact, even under their watch, they had–Manitoba ratepayers suffered through 11 increases in 12 years under the NDP, Madam Speaker.

      And you know what else they did, Madam Speaker? When they first got elected in 2001, the–one of their first orders of busi­ness: double the water power rental rates to Manitobans, Manitoba Hydro. That had a direct impact on the rates for Manitobans.

      Madam Speaker, at that time, $52‑million increase on the backs of Manitoba Hydro ratepayers. That is the legacy the NDP have left.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for St. James, on a supplementary question.

Mr. Sala: High electricity costs means small busi­nesses will have fewer resources to create jobs, invest in their busi­nesses and contribute to the prov­incial economy. Small businesses are still struggling to recover from the pandemic. The last thing they need is another rate hike from this PC gov­ern­ment.

      CFIB says that the PC gov­ern­ment's Bill 36, quote, draws serious concern, end quote, for how it limits the Public Utilities Board's ability to in­de­pen­dently review rate increases.

      Will the minister change course today, listen to small busi­ness owners and stop hiking up their hydro rates?

Mr. Cullen: Well, Madam Speaker, the only people that have been hiking rates for Manitoba Hydro were the NDP. In fact, they also doubled the debt guarantee rate for Manitoba Hydro–again, forcing increased rates 11 out of 12 years on the backs of Manitoba Hydro ratepayers.

      We, our gov­ern­ment, recog­nized that was the wrong approach. That is why we reduced both the water rental rates and the debt guarantee rates in half, saving Manitoba Hydro and Manitoba Hydro rate­payers $185 million this year alone.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for St. James, on a final supplementary.

Mr. Sala: Manitobans know that it was this gov­ern­ment that wrote legislation explicitly designed to raise hydro rates on Manitobans. They should be ashamed of that record.

      This PC gov­ern­ment didn't like the Public Utilities Board in­de­pen­dent oversight of hydro rates, so they rewrote the law to let them hike up rates by 5 per cent every year. This is hurting Manitoban families, and it's hurting Manitoba busi­nesses.

      I'll table the letter from CFIB calling on this gov­ern­ment to cancel their planned 5 per cent rate hike over the next year.

      Manitobans are in a cost-of-living crisis, and they need support now.

      Will this minister do the right thing for struggling Manitoba families and small busi­nesses and stop hiking hydro rates today?

Mr. Cullen: Well, Madam Speaker, the NDP left Manitoba Hydro with a legacy of $24 billion in debt because of their boondoggle and because they completely ignored the Public Utilities Board when they started to building Bipole III and Keeyask.

      Madam Speaker, we believe in a strong Manitoba Hydro, and we believe in a strong Public Utilities Board. That's why we're taking these steps to reduce a debt guarantee and water rental rates to Manitoba Hydro. As well, we've added $2 million in this year's budget to strengthen the oversight of the Public Utilities Board.

Manitoba Public Insurance
Work-From-Home Policy

Mr. Dougald Lamont (St. Boniface): After months, even years, of controversy, the CEO of MPI has been replaced. While there have been hundreds of millions of dollars in Project Nova cost overruns and millions more in contract consulting, we've heard that's only the tip of the iceberg.

      We've heard that one of the current issues at MPI is that workers were promised a flexible back-to-work plan, which was suddenly revoked. Some folks working remotely were much more productive. We heard that after a visit to MPI by the minister, this plan was suddenly scrapped. Some workers were in tears because they'd already rearranged their lives, includ­ing cancelling child care based on the plan.

      Can the Premier (Mrs. Stefanson) confirm that the minister was the one who instructed MPI that all workers had to come to work in person?

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister responsible for the Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation): Well, it seems that half the questions are that we're either too involved with MPI or not involved enough with MPI, Madam Speaker.

      I do want to take this op­por­tun­ity, though, to welcome the new interim CEO, Marnie Kacher, who has 15 years of manage­ment ex­per­ience at MPI, along with Ward Keith, the new board chair, who has 30 years of ex­per­ience at Manitoba Public Insurance.

      We know they'll bring solid leadership to the organi­zation, and we look forward to seeing that leadership in action, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for St. Boniface, on a supplementary question.

Release of Third-Party Review

Mr. Lamont: One of the things I've seen since becoming MLA is the in­cred­ible power that our Crown cor­por­ation monopolies hold and why they need in­de­pen­dent oversight while still being account­able to the public and stake­holders, and still having min­is­terial account­ability.

      In the last few years, MPI went after brokers. They threatened the Automotive Trades Association; if they didn't sign a lousy contract, they pulled their licences. Its coffers were plundered so the PCs could send out cheques for pandemic relief. By any measure, this is a fiasco. Manitobans have the right to know exactly what went wrong at MPI.

      Will the Premier commit to releasing the third-party review findings before the general election this fall?

Mr. Goertzen: Well, no pun intended, but that was a bit of a drive-by smear at MPI by the member for St. Boniface.

       Madam Speaker, we are very pleased that the cor­por­ation's under strong and new leadership, both at the board level and also at the executive manage­ment level. We know that their financials are on solid footing. We know that they're transitioning to a new online system to provide better servers for Manitobans.

      We also know that we have historic low rates when it comes to MPI and historic rebates. When the NDP were in gov­ern­ment, the only thing that they did was demand free Jets tickets.

Shaw Internet and TV Prices
Bulk Pricing for Low-Income Rental Housing

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, an Indigenous-led volunteer expert group has had meetings with Shaw to look at the possi­bility of nego­tiating bulk TV and Internet prices for low-income rental housing properties. Bell was not interested.

      Headquarters office repre­sen­tatives from Shaw in Calgary said Shaw could provide this service at $20  per unit, per month, an outstanding value for tenants. Of parti­cular interest is the possi­bility of including Manitoba's approximately 13,000 public housing units and more than 3,000 not-for-profit, pre­domi­nantly seniors' housing units.

* (14:30)

      I ask the Premier whether she would agree to meet with the repre­sen­tatives of this volunteer expert group, who are in the gallery today, to take advantage of this possi­bility?

Hon. Rochelle Squires (Minister of Families): Our gov­ern­ment is working hard to ensure that everybody has a safe and affordable place to call home and that they have the ability to provide for services for their family.

      And that is why our gov­ern­ment has increased invest­ments. We have raised the EIA rate. We have continuously invested in our public housing in Manitoba. This is some­thing, by the way, that the member opposite has voted against, each and every time.

      But, Madam Speaker, there is an op­por­tun­ity. If that member really is concerned about affordability in Manitoba, about ensuring that everybody has an equal op­por­tun­ity in this province, he'll vote in favour of a budget which has historical invest­ments for all Manitobans, parti­cularly those with low income.

Brandon Police and Bear Clan
Funding Announcement

Mr. Len Isleifson (Brandon East): Madam Speaker, our gov­ern­ment continues to prioritize public safety by investing and provi­ding supports in our police and in our com­mu­nity organi­zations.

      We know that the NDP don't believe in funding our local law en­force­ment. Instead, they would rather defund the police and any other safety initiatives.

      Can the Minister of Justice please share how our gov­ern­ment continues to focus on making our streets safer?

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I'd like to thank the extra­ordin­ary MLA for Brandon East for that question.

      On this side of the House, in our gov­ern­ment, we support front-line officers. We support emergency respon­ders. We support com­mu­nity groups who are out there working to make the streets safer.

      We know that on the other side of the House, like the member for St. Johns (MLA Fontaine), they said the police don't need more money. They've said it on the record. Our Premier (Mrs. Stefanson) in contrast, was in Brandon last week and provided $349,000 of support to the Brandon Police Service and to the Bear Clan.

      On this side of the House, we have the back of the police and the Bear Clan. On that side of the House, they've turned their back.

York Factory Cree Nation
Youth Mental Health Supports

Mr. Eric Redhead (Thompson): York Factory Cree Nation's chief, Darryl Wastesicoot, is raising the alarm about the urgent need for youth mental health supports.

      Recent youth suicides and suicide attempts have prompted a state of emergency in the com­mu­nity. Chief Wastesicoot says that isolation and a lack of infra­structure are contributing to the crisis and that previous calls to gov­ern­ment have failed.

      Thoughts and prayers are not enough, Madam Speaker. They need action now.

      What is this PC gov­ern­ment doing to address the crisis in York Factory Cree Nation?

Hon. Janice Morley-Lecomte (Minister of Mental Health and Community Wellness): I first want to begin by thanking all the front-line workers, the counsellors, the teachers, those who work at the crisis stabilization, the mobile crisis units, who are working and provi­ding services for individuals living in the northern parts of our province. Also, the tele­psychiatry services that are provided through the psychiatrists.

      They're all working together to provide supports so families are able to get the help they need, when they need it.

Madam Speaker: The time for oral questions has expired.

Petitions

Punjabi Bilingual Programs in Public Schools

Mr. Nello Altomare (Transcona): I wish to present the following petition to the Legis­lative Assembly.

      To the Legis­lative Assembly of Manitoba, the back­ground to this petition is as follows:

      (1) According to census 2021, Punjabi is the fourth most spoken language in Canada and there are 33,315 people in Manitoba whose native language is Punjabi.

      (2) Thousands of Punjabi new­comers are coming to Manitoba as students and as immigrants, looking to call this province home. People of Punjabi origin contribute a great deal to the social-economic dev­elop­ment of Canada and Manitoba in fields such as edu­ca­tion, science, health, busi­ness and politics.

      (3) In coming to Manitoba, Punjabi new­comers make sacrifices, including distance from their cultural roots and language. Many Punjabi parents and families want their children to retain their language and keep a continued cultural ap­pre­cia­tion.

      (4) Manitoba has many good bilingual programs in public schools for children and teens available in other languages, including French, Ukrainian, Ojibwe, Cree, Hebrew and Spanish. Punjabi bilingual pro­grams for children and teens as well as Punjabi language instruction at a college and uni­ver­sity level could similarly teach and maintain Punjabi language and culture.

      (5) Punjabi bilingual instruction would help cross-cultural friendships, relationships and marriages and prepare young people to be multilingual pro­fes­sionals.

      We therefore petition the Legis­lative Assembly of Manitoba as follows:

      To urge the prov­incial gov­ern­ment to take steps to implement Punjabi bilingual programs in public schools similar to existing bilingual programs and 'dake'–take steps to implement Punjabi language instruction in other levels of edu­ca­tion in Manitoba.

      This petition is signed by Lynda Loftus, Roxanne Cyr and Manpreet Kaur Brar, as well as many other Manitobans.

Madam Speaker: In accordance with our rule 133(6), when petitions are read they are deemed to be received by the House.

Louise Bridge

Mr. Jim Maloway (Elmwood): I wish to present the following petition to the Legis­lative Assembly.

      The back­ground of this petition is as follows:

      (1) Over 25,000 vehicles per day cross the Louise Bridge, which has served as a vital link for vehicular traffic between northeast Winnipeg and the downtown for the last 112 years.

      (2) The current structure will undoubtedly be declared unsafe in a few years is–as it has deteriorated extensively, is now functionally obsolete, therefore more subject to more frequent unplanned repairs and cannot be widened to accommodate future traffic capacity.

      (3) As far back as 2008, City of Winnipeg, City, has studied where the new re­place­ment bridge should be situated.

      (4) After including the bridge re­place­ment in the City's five-year capital budget forecast in 2009, the new bridge became a short-term construction priority in the City's trans­por­tation master plan of 2011.

      (5) City capital and budget plans identified re­place­ment of the Louise Bridge on a site just east of the bridge and expropriated homes there on the south side of Nairn Avenue in anticipation of a 2015 start.

      (6) In 2014, the new Louise–the new City admin­is­tra­tion did not make use of available federal infrastructure funds.

      (7) The new Louise Bridge Com­mit­tee began its campaign to demand a new bridge and its surveys confirmed that residents wanted a new bridge beside the current bridge, with the old bridge kept open for local traffic.

      (8) The NDP prov­incial gov­ern­ment signalled its firm commit­ment to partner with the City on replacing the Louise Bridge in its 2015 Throne Speech. Unfor­tunately, prov­incial infrastructure initiatives such as the new Louise bridge came to a halt with the election of the Progressive Conservative gov­ern­ment of 2016.

      (9) More recently, the City tethered the Louise Bridge replacement issue to a new trans­por­tation master plan and eastern corridor project. Its recom­men­dations have now identified the location of the new Louise bridge to be placed just to the west of the current bridge, not to the east as originally proposed.

      (10) The City expropriation process has begun. The $6.35‑million street upgrade of Nairn Avenue from Watt Street to the 112‑year-old bridge is complete.

      (11) The new City admin­is­tra­tion has delayed the decision on the Louise Bridge for at least a year, possibly up to 10 years, unless the Province steps in on behalf of northeast Winnipeg residents and completes this overdue link.

      (12) The Premier has a duty to direct the prov­incial gov­ern­ment to provide financial assist­ance to the City so it can complete this long overdue vital link in northeast Winnipeg and Transcona.

      We petition the Legis­lative Assembly of Manitoba as follows:

      (1) To urge the Premier to financially assist the City of Winnipeg on building this three-lane bridge in each direction to maintain this vital link between northeast Winnipeg, Transcona and the downtown.

      (2) To urge the prov­incial gov­ern­ment to recom­mend that the City of Winnipeg keep the old bridge fully open to traffic while the new bridge is under con­struction; and

      (3) To urge the prov­incial gov­ern­ment to consider the feasibility of keeping the old Louise Bridge open for active trans­por­tation in the future.

      This petition is signed by many, many Manitobans.

* (14:40)

Madam Speaker: Grievances?

ORDERS OF THE DAY

(Continued)

GOVERNMENT BUSINESS

House Business

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Government House Leader): Couple of an­nounce­ments before calling busi­ness for the afternoon.

      Pursuant to rule 34(7), I'm announcing that the private member's reso­lu­tion to be considered on the next Tuesday of private members' busi­ness will be the one put forward by the hon­our­able member for Selkirk (Mr. Lagimodiere). The title of the reso­lu­tion is Thanking Those Who Have Been a Part of the Forty Second Legislature.

Madam Speaker: It has been announced that the private member's reso­lu­tion to be considered on the next Tuesday of private members' busi­ness will be one put forward by the hon­our­able member for Selkirk. The title of the reso­lu­tion is Thanking Those Who Have Been a Part of the Forty Second Legislature.

Mr. Goertzen: I'd like to announce that the Standing Com­mit­tee on Social and Economic Dev­elop­ment will meet on Thursday, May 25th, 2023, at 6 p.m. to consider the following: Bill 218, An Act respecting the Title "Associate Judge" (Various Acts Amended); Bill 230, The Munici­pal Councils and School Boards Elections Amend­ment Act; and Bill 237, The Advanced Edu­ca­tion Admin­is­tra­tion Amend­ment Act.

Madam Speaker: It has been announced that the Standing Com­mit­tee on Social and Economic Dev­elop­ment will meet on Thursday, May 25th, 2023, at 6 p.m. to consider the following: Bill 218, An Act respecting the Title "Associate Judge" (Various Acts Amended); Bill 230, The Munici­pal Councils and School Boards Elections Amend­ment Act; and Bill 237, The Advanced Edu­ca­tion Admin­is­tra­tion Amend­ment Act.

* * *

Mr. Goertzen: Could you please resolve into–resolve the House into Com­mit­tee of Supply.

Madam Speaker: It has been announced that the House will consider Estimates this afternoon. This House will now resolve into Com­mit­tee of Supply.

      Mr. Deputy Speaker, please take the chair.

Committee of Supply

Legislative Assembly

Mr. Chairperson (Andrew Micklefield): Will the Com­mit­tee of Supply please come to order. This section of the Com­mit­tee of Supply will now consider the Estimates of the Legis­lative Assembly.

      Does the hon­our­able Speaker have an opening statement?

Hon. Myrna Driedger (Speaker of the Legislative Assembly): I do.

      I am pleased to be in attendance for con­sid­era­tion of the Legis­lative Assembly Estimates in my capacity as Speaker of the Assembly.

      I have served as Speaker for the past seven years, and it has definitely been a high­light of my career as an MLA to serve in the role of Speaker. I take con­sid­erable pride in the work done by Assembly staff and the various initiatives that have been under­taken for the Assembly during my tenure as Speaker.

      Once upon a time, the gov­ern­ment House leader used to defend the Assembly Estimates. However, for the past 22 years, the Assembly Estimates have been presented in the Com­mit­tee of Supply by the Speaker, which demonstrates the separation of the Assembly from executive gov­ern­ment.

      In my role as Speaker, I take my respon­si­bilities for the Legis­lative Assembly very seriously. I work hard to ensure that good services are provided to members, and that the in­de­pen­dence of the Legis­lative Assembly is respected. Over the years, the Assembly has been able to accom­plish many good things for members, and we hope to continue this in the future.

      Today I will be noting some of the initiatives under­taken during the previous fiscal year. During this time we saw society begin to return back to normal activities, as vaccines and increased know­ledge about the trans­mis­sion of the COVID‑19 coronavirus, as well as changes in public health orders, made the transition back to regular activities a more viable option.

      Some of the highlights under­taken in the return to normal operations over the year–this past year include: all MLAs being present in the Chamber to partici­pate in proceedings, instead of having reduced capacity numbers for social distancing reasons; the retention of the virtual partici­pation option for MLAs to attend sittings of the House and com­mit­tee meetings for circum­stances where travel or health concerns made it prudent for some members to partici­pate virtually; the return of the ap­pre­cia­tion lunch held for Assembly staff by human resource services; the resumption of MLAs attending parlia­mentary conferences and pro­fes­sional dev­elop­ment learning op­por­tun­ities in person; the holding of a Christmas lunch for staff of the Legis­lative Assembly by the Speaker; the return of the Speaker's ap­pre­cia­tion lunch for staff and pre­sen­ta­tion of service awards; the use of the Assembly Chamber for holding the annual sessions of the Manitoba Youth Parliament, and Parlement jeunesse franco-manitobain.

* (14:50)

      In addition, other im­por­tant initiatives under­taken over the past year include: the release of the second Legis­lative Assembly annual report, covering the years 2020 to 2022; the hiring of a second staff person to augment the Assembly's Digital Media Branch; the recruitment and hiring of an IT manager and a senior technical support person for the Assembly's new IT branch for the Assembly offices in the Legis­lative Building; a change to the rules of the House where traditional Indigenous and traditional cultural or ethnic clothing can now be worn in the Chamber without requiring special permission; and the election of the first Muslim MLA in Manitoba's history.

      Another sig­ni­fi­cant milestone for the Assembly took place with the passage of and coming into force of Bill 26, the officers of the Legis­lative Assembly, various acts amended, on June 1st, 2022. This legis­lation changed the respon­si­bility for ap­point­ment and remuneration of officers of the Legis­lative Assembly to the Legis­lative Assembly Manage­ment Com­mis­sion. Previously, these ap­point­ments had been made by order-in-council with remuneration set by execu­tive gov­ern­ment.

      The Standing Com­mit­tee on Legis­lative Affairs continues to be the body tasks with conducting the hiring process and recommending a candidate for ap­point­ment in relation to the Advocate for Children and Youth, the Auditor General, the Chief Electoral Officer, the Infor­ma­tion and Privacy Adjudicator, the Conflict of Interest Com­mis­sioner–ethics com­mis­sioner, after the next prov­incial election–the Lobbyist Registrar and the Ombudsman, while the com­mis­sion has the respon­si­bility for their recruitment and recom­men­dation of a candidate for the Clerk of the Legis­lative Assembly.

      Previously, the name of the recom­mended candidate would be provided to the Clerk of Executive Council to confirm the offer and salary and then prepare the ap­point­ment order-in-council. Now, in all cases for these officers, the salary and benefits will be esta­blished and approved by the com­mis­sion. The names of the candidates recom­mended by the Standing Com­mit­tee on Legis­lative Affairs for these positions will be reported to the Assembly, reported from LAMC in the case of the Clerk, and the suc­cess­ful candidates will then be appointed by reso­lu­tion of the Assembly.

      In addition, on the recom­men­dations of the Advocate for Children and Youth, Auditor General, Chief Electoral Officer, the Infor­ma­tion and Privacy Adjudicator, the Lobbyist Registrar, the Ombudsman and the Clerk of the Legis­lative Assembly, duties for those offices can be appointed with the prior approval of the com­mis­sion.

      This is a sig­ni­fi­cant step for the Assembly, as it places the respon­si­bility for ap­point­ment and remuneration of the officers of the Assembly firmly under the control of the Assembly as opposed to executive gov­ern­ment.

      In conclusion, I would like to express my ap­pre­cia­tion to the staff of the Legis­lative Assembly for all the hard work and dedi­cated service they provide on behalf of members. I know it will be a busy year ahead for them with the prov­incial general election taking place in October, and I know they are up to the task of orientating new MLAs and preparing for the 43rd Legislature.

      And I would also like to just put on the record my thanks to the Legis­lative Assembly Manage­ment Com­mis­sion for their work over the past number of meetings that we have had over the past year and for their collegial discourse in order to ensure that we moved items along in an expeditious manner. So, my gratitude goes out to LAMC for the amount of work that they put in to do the job as commissioners.

      And I would be pleased to answer any questions.

Mr. Chairperson: We thank the Speaker for those comments.

      Does the official op­posi­tion repre­sen­tative have any opening comments?

MLA Nahanni Fontaine (St. Johns): I would just like to say miigwech to all of the Legislative Assembly staff and clerks.

      As many of us have said in this Chamber, there is a lot of work that goes on in respect of running and administering the Manitoba Legis­lative Assembly, and there is extra­ordin­ary expertise and historical knowledge that many of the clerks and staff hold that allow us to be able to do our jobs as MLAs and allow us to serve Manitobans, parti­cularly in these roles.

      And so, I want to say a profound miigwech for all of the work and–that goes on, the work that we don't even really see behind the scenes. I know that there are phenomenal clerks that do just amazing work that we don't see on the daily basis. We see folks that are in the Chamber and we are always in awe and ap­pre­cia­tive of those folks, but also the clerks that are behind the scenes. And, again, all of the staff that help run this Legis­lative Assembly.

      And as we move out of this 42nd Manitoba Legis­lative Assembly, I think it's im­por­tant for us all to reflect on how–what a privilege and honour it is to be able to sit in this Chamber and do the work that we are elected to do, which is to serve Manitobans, to serve in the best of our abilities, and working towards the best province that we can have.

      And it is quite an honour and quite a privilege, and I just want to say, from the bottom of my heart and on behalf of our NDP caucus, we take that respon­si­bility very, very seriously and we say a profound miigwech to be in these roles.

      Miigwech.

Mr. Chairperson: We thank the repre­sen­tative from the official op­posi­tion for those remarks.

      At this time we invite staff to enter the Chamber and I would ask the Speaker and the official op­posi­tion repre­sen­tative to please intro­duce their staff in attendance.

      In accordance with subrule 78(16), during the con­sid­era­tion of de­part­mental Estimates, questioning shall proceed in a global manner with questions put on the reso­lu­tions once the repre­sen­tative from the official op­posi­tion indicates questioning has con­cluded.

      If the hon­our­able Speaker wishes to intro­duce her staff, she may do so.

Mrs. Driedger: I would, indeed, like to intro­duce my staff.

      I have in attendance with me today Ms. Patricia Chaychuk, the Clerk of the Legis­lative Assembly, and Ms. Deanna Wilson, the executive director of admin­is­tra­tion.

Mr. Chairperson: The floor is now open for questions.

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): More of a comment than a question; a comment to my friend from Charleswood, my long-time colleague in a different time. We've served together now for, well, 20 years–it'd be 20 years for me early next month–and, of course, you were elected before that.

      And, of course, I enjoyed our time together in op­posi­tion. I think you were sitting about there, too, when we were, yes, in op­posi­tion, and you withstood and, I think, suffered some of my own comments sometimes from the op­posi­tion benches.

      But I wanted to say, because I know after the 2016 election we had the op­por­tun­ity to have lunch at a little restaurant in Assiniboine Park, and we were both sort of talking about where things had gone in our lives. And I know you probably didn't expect to take on the role of Speaker after 2016. It's probably some­thing you hadn't thought about or maybe dreamt about when we were in op­posi­tion.

      But I want to say you've done an extra­ordin­ary job, and I look at not only the way that you've handled the House, but equally and maybe more im­por­tantly, outside of the House, some of the connections that you draw. I know pushing and advocating for a lot of the issues on women in politics have been very, very im­por­tant, the connections through things like our midwest legis­lators conference and the importance of having those interjurisdictional discussions, some of the challenges at LAMC, and, of course, those are all internal so they'll remain internal. But you stick­handled those well, always advocating for the Office of the Legis­lative Assembly, but knowing that the challenges that come with having to fund some things, too.

      And so, I just wanted to say, because I know there won't be many more op­por­tun­ities for me to say it, and maybe not any more op­por­tun­ities in the next seven days before we conclude the session and go into the next election, that I've not only enjoyed serving with you as a colleague, but you've done an extra­ordin­ary job as Speaker and any uncertainties or insecurities you may have had at that lunch we had at the Assiniboine Park that day many years ago, you certainly have overcome and done it with elegance and class.

* (15:00)

      So, thank you, Madam Speaker.

Mr. Chairperson: Are there any other questions?

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): I'm going to take this op­por­tun­ity to comment, as well, and to thank you, Madam Speaker, for your efforts.

      I know it's been a challenge here with all the heckling that often goes on sometimes. But I think you've done a very credible and forthright job, and I want to thank you on behalf of the Manitoba Liberal caucus for all you've done.

Mr. Chairperson: Are there any further questions?

      Seeing none, we will proceed with the reso­lu­tions.

      Starting with reso­lu­tion 1.1: RESOLVED that there be granted to His Majesty a sum not exceeding $12,307,000 for Legis­lative Assembly, Other Assembly Expenditures, for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Resolution agreed to.

      Reso­lu­tion 1.2: RESOLVED that there be granted to His Majesty a sum not exceeding $7,801,000 for Legis­lative Assembly, Office of the Auditor General, for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Resolution agreed to.

      Reso­lu­tion 1.3: RESOLVED that there be granted to His Majesty a sum not exceeding $4,638,000 for Legis­lative Assembly, Office of the Ombudsman, for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Resolution agreed to.

      Reso­lu­tion 1.4: RESOLVED that there be granted to His Majesty a sum not exceeding $2,733,000 for Legis­lative Assembly, Office of the Chief Electoral Officer, for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Resolution agreed to.

      Reso­lu­tion 1.5: RESOLVED that there be granted to His Majesty a sum not exceeding $6,510,000 for Legis­lative Assembly, Office of the Advocate for Children and Youth, for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Resolution agreed to.

      And finally, reso­lu­tion 1.6: RESOLVED that there be granted to His Majesty a sum not exceeding $1,365,000 for Legis­lative Assembly, Capital Assets, for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Resolution agreed to.

      This completes the Estimates of the Legis­lative Assembly. This also concludes the con­sid­era­tion of de­part­mental Estimates in the Com­mit­tee of Supply for this session.

      And I would like to thank all those who partici­pated in this process for their dedi­cation and diligence.

      Com­mit­tee rise.

      Call in the Speaker.

IN SESSION

Committee Report

Mr. Andrew Micklefield (Chairperson): Madam Speaker, the Com­mit­tee of Supply has considered and adopted certain reso­lu­tions.

      I move, seconded by the hon­our­able member for McPhillips (Mr. Martin), that the report of the com­mit­tee be received.

Motion agreed to.

* * *

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Government House Leader): I'd like to call Main and Supply.

Madam Speaker: It has been announced that the House will now consider this afternoon the Com­mit­tee of Supply to consider the concurrence motion.

      And the House will now resolve into Com­mit­tee of Supply.

      Mr. Deputy Speaker, please take the Chair.

Committee of Supply

Concurrence Motion

Mr. Chairperson (Andrew Micklefield): Will the Committee of Supply please come to order.

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I move that the Com­mit­tee of Supply concur in all supply reso­lu­tions relating to the Estimates of expenditure for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024, which have been adopted at this session whether by a section of the Com­mit­tee of Supply or by the full com­mit­tee.

Motion presented.

Mr. Chairperson: The motion is in order.

      For the infor­ma­tion of all members, on Thursday May 18th, 2023, the Official Op­posi­tion House Leader (MLA Fontaine) tabled the list of ministers to be called for questioning in debate on the concurrence motion. As per that list, all members of Cabinet will be questioned concurrently.

      The floor is now open for questions.

Mr. Jamie Moses (St. Vital): Wanted to follow up in that concern that was brought to my attention by some students in post-secondary in­sti­tutions.

      Now, this is–I'm not sure if it's related directly to the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion or perhaps the Minister of Gov­ern­ment Services, but it's regarding the STEP program–that's the Student Temporary Em­ploy­ment Program. And when we looked up some of the concerns the students were raising, they–we popped on to the website and we were concerned by what it says here when it comes to the wages that the gov­ern­ment advertises on the website.

      According to the government website, which I have printed out and which I will table for the minister, it says, quote–here, under the wages section–quote, hourly wages are deter­mined by the complexity of the job duties and range between $11.95 and $14.34. End quote.

      So, that's the quote on the gov­ern­ment website. Now, as the minister would note, that's significantly below the minimum wage set as of August 1st, 2023.

* (15:10)

      And so, I would like to know from the minister why he's proposing to pay students below the minimum wage for the STEP program. That seems like it's a–directly in contravention of the gov­ern­ment's own policy around minimum wage and a dis­service to students.

      And I'd like to know what of the minister–how the minister plans to address this on the website.

Hon. James Teitsma (Minister responsible for the Manitoba public service): Hello. Yes, happy to address this question for the member, and accidentally sum­moned a page and so attracted the attention of the Deputy Speaker. But, in any case, I'm now happy to field the question.

      As the member does understand, I think, that I'm not only in charge of Gov­ern­ment Services and Con­sumer Pro­tec­tion, but also the Manitoba civil service, the public service, which–and I can assure the mem­ber–does abide by minimum wage legis­lation.

      So, I ap­pre­ciate what he has pointed out, and I will bring that back to the de­part­ment to ensure that accurate and timely infor­ma­tion is being shared on our website.

      And, in the meantime, I can assure the member that we do abide by minimum wage legis­lation.

Mr. Chairperson: Just a friendly note to all ministers to be mindful if you're raising your hand to get the attention of a page, you may inadvertently volunteer yourself to answer a question that is being asked.

      So, forewarned is forearmed. Let's try this again.

Mr. Moses: Just, you know, to–as obviously, the minister would know that those rate–'wates'–rates are significantly below minimum wage–a full $2.20 below minimum wage, is sig­ni­fi­cant.

      And so, it's certainly con­cern­ing if that's the offer the gov­ern­ment is putting on there. And even if it's not, if it's a mistake on the website, that, you know, would dissuade some good applicants from applying for those if they see this listed on the public website.

      So, I'd wonder if the minister has a parti­cular time frame of when this might get fixed so that students who are looking for em­ploy­ment can–have ensured that they're going to get paid at least at minimum wage, although, I think, we know that working for the gov­ern­ment, many employees might deserve to get paid higher and oftentimes significantly higher above minimum wage, based on the jobs and tasks that they're required.

      And so, wonder if the minister can (a) commit to when that's going to get fixed and resolved, and (b) also be able to ensure the current and correct wages for students and whether he's reviewing increasing them, given cost-of-living impacts.

Mr. Teitsma: Yes, thank you very much, ap­pre­ciate the question. I think what I heard the member saying was that our gov­ern­ment has put forward un­pre­cedented increases to the minimum wage lately, and certainly, the minimum wage has gone up significantly in the last few years.

      And I hope that the member can ap­pre­ciate that that was done and that that is also very beneficial to students who are often the ones who do make minimum wage, that they're now able to make a more sig­ni­fi­cant income when they pursue summer em­ploy­ment or temporary em­ploy­ment or even em­ploy­ment during their studies, as many students do.

      So, yes. No, what I would just suggest to that member is yes, I will give it my attention. Given that I have not spoken with my staff about what it will take to update this website and what timeline I can–might expect, I'm not going to make any specific commit­ments, but I will hope that by the time he's ready to leave this Legis­lative Assembly for the summer, that he should check the website again and hopefully every­thing looks good by then.

Mr. Moses: During my Estimates period with the Minister of Advanced Edu­ca­tion, I tabled a report on advanced edu­ca­tion, the–building the best edu­ca­tion–adult edu­ca­tion system in Canada, a roadmap and action plan for Manitoba.

      Wondering if the minister had an op­por­tun­ity to read and review the report and whether she is planning on acting on any of the recom­men­dations in the report.

Hon. Sarah Guillemard (Minister of Advanced Education and Training): Can I just have the mem­ber just repeat or clarify which report he's referring to?

Mr. Moses: I'm referring to the report that I tabled during our Estimates com­mit­tee, that's the report on adult edu­ca­tion called Building the Best Adult Edu­ca­tion System in Canada: A Roadmap and Action Plan for Manitoba, authored by Jim Silver. It's a report that I tabled during our Estimates com­mit­tee to you.

      Wondering if you've had a chance since our Estimates discussions about a month ago to read and review the report and to–my question for you is if you have, what recom­men­dations are you looking at imple­men­ting from the report?

Mrs. Guillemard: Yes, I ap­pre­ciate the clari­fi­ca­tion.

      Yes, I know that my de­part­ment was very familiar with the report, and they were happy to share some of those details with me. It has been considered when we are looking at some of the refinements we are making to some of our plans and–in con­sid­era­tion with our post-secondary planning.

      Specific recom­men­dations, at this point, I'm not able to identify to share with the member. But I don't think there was any recom­men­dations within the report that we disagreed with.

Mr. Moses: And I also wanted to ask the minister–actually, the minister respon­si­ble for Research Manitoba regarding–because during the Estimates period, I spoke with the Minister for Advanced Edu­ca­tion, who referred to me–referred me to the Minister of Eco­nomic Dev­elop­ment, as she said that Research Manitoba was now under the respon­si­bility of Eco­nomic Dev­elop­ment.

      So, I wanted to ask the Minister for Economic Dev­elop­ment regarding Research Manitoba and to clarify the funding for Research Manitoba.

      Obviously, the funding has gone down for Research Manitoba under this current gov­ern­ment–significantly down–about $5 million, which is about a third of their total funding from the Province.

      So, can the minister explain the sort of impact that cutting the funding for Research Manitoba has had on Manitoba's competitiveness?

Hon. Jeff Wharton (Minister of Economic Development, Investment and Trade): I thank the member from St. Vital for that question, and certainly a good question.

      And I would like to ask the member–I'm going to, because of the adoption of a number of areas within our de­part­ment and Research Manitoba being one of them, I'd like to ensure that I provide him with the exact details. So, I will do that–I will endeavour to do that post this meeting.

* (15:20)

MLA Malaya Marcelino (Notre Dame): On July 8, 2021, the Province announced an online portal launched to connect IENs to licensing process ser­vices and supports, including a grant of up to $23,000 per IEN for financial assist­ance for assessment and training costs and other costs that come with obtaining licensure in Manitoba.

      Since that date, I'd like to ask the minister how much money has been spent on these grants and how many IENs have qualified for these grants.

Hon. Audrey Gordon (Minister of Health): I'm pleased to have the op­por­tun­ity to talk about our gov­ern­ment's invest­ment in internationally educated nurses and the work that is being done across many de­part­ments, really a whole-of-gov­ern­ment approach to addressing the needs of internationally educated nurses.

      First, we created the portal where individuals can access up to $23,000 to support them on their journey to licensure, Mr. Chair. And I understand that several hundred individuals have taken advantage of that funding and are at various stages in their licensure journey.

      Since then, we have moved forward with even more supports, hiring nurse–internationally educated nurse navigators in the de­part­ment of–in Manitoba Health, Mr. Chair, and ensuring that there–recently, there was a online virtual pre­sen­ta­tion that was made available to all internationally educated nurses that are in the portal to help them to understand the changes that have been made through the various colleges respon­si­ble for nursing licensure–the College of Registered Nurses of Manitoba, the College of Licenced Practical Nurses and the college of psych nursing–to make it easier for internationally educated nurses to get licensed.

      So we've worked very closely with all of those colleges. In fact, CRNM has made seven moderniz­ations that will allow for internationally educated nurses to partici­pate in a program that has received rave reviews and–which is the undergraduate nurse employee program.

      It initially started out as an offer to college of nursing students at the Uni­ver­sity of Manitoba who were in their third and fourth year of the program. They were given an op­por­tun­ity to get paid em­ploy­ment in our health facilities while being mentored by senior nursing staff and gaining critical clinical hands-on ex­per­ience in the work­place, a very competitive wage. And what we've found is that a high percentage of those individuals remain working here in Manitoba and receive job offers at various facilities, com­mu­nity and acute care.

      So, the changes and the modernizations made by the CRNM will allow internationally educated nurses to now partici­pate as uncertified nurse employees. They will also have an op­por­tun­ity to do that while they're in the bridging program. Many of them are in the bridging program that's offered by Red River College Polytechnic, and while they are in that program completing their bridging, they'll be able to get this hands-on clinical ex­per­ience, Mr. Chair.

      And so, our internationally educated nurses are a valuable asset to this province. We want to ensure that Manitoba remains a welcoming place for inter­nationally educated individuals. We are modernizing pathways. We are making it easier for individuals to complete their clinical competency assessment.

      Uni­ver­sity of Manitoba College of Nursing is pilot–is in the midst of a pilot with the Philippines, where we did some recruitment this spring to have–to provide the ability for individuals to complete the clinical competency assessment testing while they are in their homeland.

      And so we are certainly stream­lining not just here in Manitoba, but for individuals before they even arrive in Manitoba, so they can–more stream­lined licensure, more stream­lined supports. Once they arrive in Manitoba, those nurse navigators will be assisting them through their walk, their journey, to licensure. And the $23,000 per IEN will be available and so much more, Mr. Chair.

      So, I look forward to welcoming more IENs to Manitoba.

MLA Marcelino: I just wanted to make sure that I got that number straight, that there's about several hundred IENs that have been able to access this specific grant at $23,000 each, and possibly at a cost of over $16 million.

      Is that correct?

Ms. Gordon: So, my comment was that there are several hundred internationally educated nurses that have taken advantage of applying through the portal. I do not have the exact number of how many have actually accessed the $23,000 that is available per IEN, but I do know that there are several hundred individuals who've taken advantage of joining the portal.

      Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Mr. Chairperson: I see three hands raised. I'm going to acknowl­edge the hon­our­able member for Notre Dame (MLA Marcelino), who's been asking the last few questions.

MLA Marcelino: Yes, this is just the last question.

      So, yes, my question was, how many IENs have actually been able to suc­cess­fully access that $23,000 grant?

Ms. Gordon: Again, several hundred individuals have applied to the portal, and applying to the portal gives each and every individual an op­por­tun­ity to access up to $23,000 to assist with costs associated with their licensure, be it supports for rent or for child care while they are under­taking their bridging program.

      How many of–how many individuals have taken up that offer, I do not have that infor­ma­tion available. But if we're talking about access, Mr. Chair, every individual who applies to the portal has access to the funding that is available.

MLA Uzoma Asagwara (Union Station): I'd like to ask the Health Minister about the safety issues that nurses are reporting at Health Sciences Centre.

      So, we raised this in question period a couple of weeks ago, and the minister is well aware that the nurses and health-care pro­fes­sionals and staff at the hospital are really struggling with these challenges around safety getting to and from their vehicles before and after work. I spoke with a nurse over the weekend who had just gotten her vehicle back from having windows smashed and belongings taken. Her day back to work with the same vehicle, her vehicle was vandalized yet again, windows smashed.

      And these folks have been reaching out, asking for gov­ern­ment support in addressing the safety concerns they have. I'm wondering, since this issue's been raised and brought to the minister's attention, if she's taken any action to provide supports to those nurses and staff at HSC to help deal with the imme­diate safety concerns they've been dealing with that have been increasing.

* (15:30)

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): I want to thank the member for the question, and they raise a very im­por­tant issue and one I know that we've heard spe­cific­ally from the health com­mu­nity but also more generally in terms of public safety from other individuals as well.

      And the member will know that the gov­ern­ment created the in­sti­tutional safety officer program, created the training program and has had a number of different individuals who've gone through the program and have been hired by in­sti­tutions. I believe one was trained for the health-care sector spe­cific­ally; there might be others in the queue. There's a number that have been trained for the–for Uni­ver­sity of Manitoba in parti­cular, I believe. Might be other in­sti­tutions–post-secondary in­sti­tutions who are looking to hire individuals as well.

      Of course, these would be employees of the individual regional health author­ities, not the De­part­ment of Justice spe­cific­ally. But the gov­ern­ment did respond to the ability to have individuals trained. And I do believe that there has been training for individuals within the health-care sector. And I think we certainly would hope that there'll be more.

MLA Asagwara: Well, I thank the Minister of Justice for that response. I do think that clarity around this issue is really im­por­tant.

      These issues are reportedly escalating, and it's a deterrent for us not only recruiting nurses to the health-care system, of which we have a tre­men­dous shortage, but it's also a deterrent from nurses remaining in the health-care system who are currently working there. I've spoken with nurses who are 22 years into their careers and are feeling very much like they need to leave their jobs at HSC because of the safety challenges.

      So, while I hear the minister talking about in­sti­tutional safety officers who have been trained and are being hired elsewhere, this is not some­thing that benefits the nurses at HSC. Those officers are not on site.

      And so, what I'm seeking is clarity. What can I bring back to these nurses and health-care workers who are asking us to advocate on their behalf and for the gov­ern­ment to take action? Has any action what­so­ever been taken to help improve the safety concerns at HSC for these nurses and health-care staff?

Mr. Goertzen: Certainly, there has been an action taken, and I ap­pre­ciate the member's concern. And I believe, you know, they raise it with the right concern because we don't want to see individuals leaving the health-care field for reasons of security–or, frankly, for any reason, if they would prefer to be in that occupation.

      The realities around the institutional safety officers is the program took some time to not only develop but then to provide the ap­pro­priate training for the individual in­sti­tutions. That was completed, I think, a few months ago. There have been some graduates that have been–completed the program. For–the uni­ver­sity was obviously more aggressive in terms of putting people through the program, but there have been some training for health individuals, I believe, so my ex­pect­a­tion would be that there would be more.

      So, I think that the member can take back to those that they are speaking with that this is an im­por­tant issue for the gov­ern­ment. It's been signified as being im­por­tant through the creation of the in­sti­tutional safety officer program, a program that didn't exist before, just as safety is more generally. And there's other safety issues that are being addressed downtown, but, you know, I'll leave that maybe for the Justice critic to ask directly.

      But I think the member can take back that there's been steps taken, and I would hope that there'll be more training through that program through officials within the regional health author­ity.

MLA Asagwara: Can the Health Minister advise if she knows of what the wait times are right now for those who are waiting on gender-affirming surgeries, procedures?

      So, I've been hearing for quite some time–and I know I've written the minister on this issue–that there are folks who have had astronomically long wait times for gender-affirming surgeries.

      Now, I know that there was an an­nounce­ment made today, but there was nothing in that an­nounce­ment that speaks to actually the folks who are currently waiting for surgeries being able to get them in a more timely manner. The wait for gender-affirming surgeries, those wait times are not on the gov­ern­ment website.

      And so, this is a really im­por­tant health-care issue. We know that gender-affirming health care is life-saving health care. I'm spe­cific­ally asking about surgeries.

      Can the Health Minister advise what the current waits are for those accessing gender-affirming surgeries and procedures–the specific–the surgeries and procedures them­selves, not access to referrals?

      Thanks.

Mr. Chairperson: The hon­our­able minister for gender equality.

Hon. Rochelle Squires (Minister responsible for Gender Equity): I ap­pre­ciate the member's question about our an­nounce­ment this morning, as it does give me an op­por­tun­ity to put some infor­ma­tion on the record as to what we were announcing at The Forks this morning.

      And that was really about expanding the mandate of the women secretariat to include gender diversity as well, and that we renamed the gender–the Manitoba status of women secretariat is now called the Gender Equity Manitoba Secretariat.

      And the an­nounce­ment today included en­hance­d funding for the secretariat to hire two ad­di­tional FTEs to the secretariat. One will be two-spirited, and one will be someone who is from the 2SLGBTQ com­mu­nity at large to provide expertise and advice to the secretariat.

      As well as–we announced three new positions on the newly renamed advisory council to ensure that we've got perspectives from the 2SLGBTQQIA+ com­mu­nity. So, there'll be a youth person appointed to this council as well as someone from the two-spirit com­mu­nity and someone from the LGBTQ com­mu­nity. That was what we had announced this morning.

      We had also provided $250,000 in dedi­cated annual funding to Pride Manitoba–Pride Winnipeg, pardon me, so that they could ensure that they've got ongoing operating dollars for hiring an executive director and office space and to just internalize–to have annualized funding so that they can strengthen their internal organi­zation and better support the more-than-25 Pride organi­zations through­out the prov­ince.

      And so, this funding, after–in–well, in the president, Barry Karlenzig's, words, he said, after, you know, 36 years, it's truly amazing to finally have core funding from the Manitoba gov­ern­ment. And he personally has been asking for over a decade to have funding for that event that attracts over 80,000 people annually. And so, we were very pleased to make that an­nounce­ment today.

      So, that concluded the an­nounce­ment today, and we have certainly more to come in the days to come, including a flag-raising ceremony that will take place on Friday, this Friday, at–in Memorial Park.

MLA Asagwara: I'd just like to get some clarity in spe­cific­ally regards to the wait times for gender-affirming surgery.

* (15:40)

      This is really im­por­tant. I spoke with a number of people–I was approached, actually, by a number of folks over the weekend who are panicking because they are likely, due to some changes that are hap­pening, not going to receive gender-affirming surgery in a timely manner. It already wasn't timely; the wait times that they'd been provided are astronomically high.

      Gender-affirming health care saves lives. Access to gender-affirming surgery prevents suicide, prevents suicide attempts. You know, we see the attacks that are happening on trans people, the rhetoric that's taking place, legis­lation, laws that are being passed that target trans families and com­mu­nities.

      Just heard the news of a trans youth throwing them­self off a bridge. Left school, walked to a bridge and threw himself off the bridge and died. That is the direct result of gov­ern­ments who bring forward hateful rhetoric and–by way of laws, et cetera. It's also the result of gov­ern­ments who fail to listen to those who depend on them to esta­blish gender-affirming policies that save lives.

      And so, the question I'm asking is–so that I can go back to folks who are coming to me asking, what are the actual wait times? Because there's nothing on the gov­ern­ment's website about them. We don't actually know what this looks like. To me, this is an area of concern that's been brought forward enough to the Health Minister where she should have an answer for it.

      So, I'm really seeking just clarity here because this is truly a life-or-death health issue. Can we get some under­standing around what the current wait times are for gender-affirming surgeries in Manitoba? We know they're long, but I'd like to be able to provide some clarity to folks who are waiting.

Mr. Chairperson: The hon­our­able minister for gender equality.

Ms. Squires: I do want to express my ap­pre­cia­tion to the member for raising this issue and bringing forward this very im­por­tant topic.

      And we did recog­nize today with the esta­blish­ment of this new secretariat that there's no place for hate in the province of Manitoba and that all members of the–of our province need to be supported and be treated equally, and that includes a myriad of initiatives, including health initiatives.

      And so the specific wait times that the member is asking for, I do request leave to–I'm not sure if I need to request leave, but I would like to have a little bit of time to compile the infor­ma­tion that she's asking–

An Honourable Member: They.

Ms. Squires: –they are asking for because I don't have that infor­ma­tion available to me right now.

MLA Asagwara: I thank the minister for her willingness to under­take to provide that infor­ma­tion. It is really im­por­tant infor­ma­tion, so I look forward to receiving it.

      I do want to point out, and it's certainly not to be antagonistic by any means, that this minister has, you know, been vocal about supporting queer com­mu­nities, 2SLGBTQ+ com­mu­nities. I do think it's really im­por­tant that, especially given the climate that we're in right now, you know, certainly I'm a person who grew up believing or not believing that I could have a parti­cular kind of life, because we didn't have certain laws esta­blished for people like me. Gay marriage, queer marriage, is a good example of that. That didn't come into effect legally in Canada until I was, you know, beyond child­hood.

      And so, I do think that it's im­por­tant that people see folks in leadership roles being able to answer questions within their portfolios that are im­por­tant. And so I do think that this is an im­por­tant question that should be answered by the Health Minister.

      Again, I ap­pre­ciate that you're willing to under­take to provide that, but this is infor­ma­tion that the De­part­ment of Health, given the concerns that had been brought forward for some time, that the Health Minister should be comfortable provi­ding a response to these questions. And I am disappointed that she has not, but I ap­pre­ciate the under­taking.

      I do have a final question regarding the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Program. We know that there have been some changes recently. I raised this in the House as well. Again, while I'm hopeful the Health Minister will answer this question, I guess we'll have to wait and see. But the manager who was hired to work remotely from Alberta resigned recently, and so with that in mind, and knowing the number of resig­na­tions that have happened within that program at HSC, I'm asking now spe­cific­ally about the infra­structure at SANE at HSC, at that site.

      That is a really im­por­tant site. It delivers a lot of care–critical care–to folks no matter where they're coming from.

      Can the Minister of Health (Ms. Gordon) provide an update on the status of the SANE program at HSC? So, at that location, has there been a new manager hired? Has there been a re­place­ment of the–I think about 10 nurses who have resigned from that program? Where are things at to date?

Mr. Chairperson: The hon­our­able minister for gender–

An Honourable Member: Equity.

Mr. Chairperson: equality.

Ms. Squires: First of all, I want to start by offering an   apology to the member for Union Station (MLA Asagwara) for incorrectly using the pronoun. I'm on a learning op­por­tun­ity and have been for quite some time, and I've endeavoured to be, you know, correct in that–in the language, because language matters. And so, I ap­pre­ciate the member's patience on that front.  

* (15:50)

      In regards to the sexual assault nurse examination program, we recog­nize that the demand was certainly over­whelming and that there needed to be two esta­blished programs: one led by the health author­ity and then another led by com­mu­nity.

      And, therefore, we had announced recently that we would be moving forward with a $1.2-million commit­ment for a com­mu­nity-led program this year, which is very uniquely structured. It has a circle of survivors that are offering guidance to this–the infra­structure of this clinic, and there will be a mobile clinic as well. We believe that that is a lot more trauma informed than–and available for those who seek that option, and that will be up and running very soon, I understand.

      In regards to the program at HSC, again, I want to express my gratitude to the nurses involved in the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Program at HSC, and it does continue to be supported by a mixture of nurses–ex­per­ienced nurses picking up the shifts, physicians and nurse prac­ti­tioners, and that right now there are four–a nurse 4 educator position is being posted to support new staff. Two ad­di­tional perma­nent nursing positions have been posted and recently hired permanent staff continue to be trained, with two more expected to be ready for in­de­pen­dent work in June and three others in July.

      We have 11 individuals from HSC partici­pating in a 12-week sexual assault nurse examiner course offered by the Northwest Polytech, and nine nurses from other regions have also expressed interest in partici­pating. So, again, we're very grateful for the number of nurses that are taking the training, or who have taken the training, and who are offering this vital service so that all survivors of sexual violence can receive the best care possible for them.

      And again, I want to commend all the survivors for expressing that courage to come forward at a very–at the most tragic time in their lives.

Ms. Lisa Naylor (Wolseley): I would like to ask the munici­palities minister this question.

      The Auditor General has opened in­vesti­gations into a number of munici­palities this past year, and their financial dealings.

      Can the minister tell me what role the de­part­ment has played in these in­vesti­gations?

Hon. Andrew Smith (Minister of Municipal Relations): I ap­pre­ciate the question from the member opposite. And we do ap­pre­ciate the op­por­tun­ity to have the in­vesti­gations–or rather, the report from the Auditor General; we take him and his entire team very seriously when they report on any dealings in our com­mu­nities and certainly in our munici­palities across the province.

      I know that, as the member knows–member opposite well knows–that munici­palities are in­de­pen­dent of the prov­incial gov­ern­ment here, so they do have the ability to operate on their own court. However, that–when the Auditor General does rule on any activities that they deem to be an issue, we ap­pre­ciate that and respect the findings of that office.

      We also ask that our de­part­ment and the gov­ern­ment of Manitoba work closely with munici­palities and certainly look at addressing the issues that are in our munici­palities, whether they are financial or any other issues. I know that munici­palities have come up with a number of issues in different munici­palities through­out the province here, and, of course, financial being one of them.

      We respect the outcome of the Auditor General's report and look forward to working closely with all of our munici­palities to make sure that the issues that are addressed in the report be dealt with and come to a reso­lu­tion.

Ms. Naylor: I'm not sure that I got a clear answer about the role the de­part­ment played.

      But did the minister request the auditor to in­vesti­gate the munici­palities of WestLake-Gladstone, St. Andrews, West St. Paul and Swan Valley West? And if he did so, can he tell us why?

Mr. Smith: The Auditor General does operate in­de­pen­dent of the prov­incial gov­ern­ment, and that's the whole role of that office, is to make sure that there's an in­de­pen­dent audit, as the name suggests.

      So, we do respect the role–the critical role–of the Auditor General and the critical work that they do in that office to make sure that not only the ethical guide­lines are followed, but certainly, we respect the taxpayers' hard-earned money that are often collected through the various levels of gov­ern­ment taxation that make sure they're respected. So, we respect the Auditor General's report and ap­pre­ciate the Auditor General bringing to light certain issues across the province.

      As in any Auditor General report, there's always going to be room for im­prove­ment, and that's why we ap­pre­ciate that being brought to light and looking forward to working with munici­palities across the province. I know munici­palities right across the prov­ince face various issues, some more–some larger com­mu­nities, some smaller com­mu­nities, they all seem to face certain issues and certain similar issues.

      We respect the Auditor General's report, and looking forward to working with munici­palities to address any of the issues in the Auditor General's report that has been outlined.

Ms. Naylor: The minister's correct that a lot of munici­palities do face a lot of different issues when it comes to admin­is­tra­tive and financial oversight. It's certainly my under­standing that the minister's de­part­ment assists munici­palities with their admin­is­tra­tive and financial oversight and gov­ern­ance issues.

      So, why was the de­part­ment unable, if that's accurate, to assist the above-noted munici­palities with these issues–the munici­palities that I already men­tioned?

Mr. Smith: Well, I thank the member for the question. And, there is a number of munici­palities that have a number of issues, and the member is correct in that, with the respect to the Auditor General's report, we respect the Auditor General's report, and we will endeavour to work together with our munici­palities to make sure that any issues that are identified are dealt with.

      With respect to–I know that there's been a number of munici­palities, in some cases, that have financial–you know, they have certain financial require­ments they have to meet. And if there's a request for an extension to a deadline, often, they will ask for that. And, you know, the gov­ern­ment of Manitoba is willing to work with these com­mu­nities to make sure that they're able to meet the deadlines and, if not, that at least they have the foresight to ask in advance and look forward to helping munici­palities meet these financial goals.

      We know that it's never–it's a challenging time to be a munici­pal level of gov­ern­ment, parti­cularly smaller munici­palities. Smaller munici­palities do have, typically, city councils or town councils that are not full time; they are part-time councils, often having other jobs, families and other demands on their schedules. So, having them come forward and put their name on the ballot is in­cred­ibly im­por­tant. And to be able to represent their con­stit­uents and their residents in a respectful and–manner, I think, is really im­por­tant.

      And we have made sure that our munici­palities are made whole through various levels of funding and increased funding–permanently increased funding–so that they are able to meet some of the challenges. A lot of them have financial challenges that these com­mu­nities will inevitably continue to face if it were not for the actions taken by the gov­ern­ment of Manitoba.

      But the munici­palities will continue to report to the province of Manitoba when it comes to financial dealings, and we will continue to work with all our munici­palities to make sure that they're able to serve their con­stit­uents and their residents in the best possible way.

Ms. Naylor: Does the minister believe–or, does the minister have a sense of the timeline for this reporting from the Auditor General and, you know, kind of, what are his hopes on when that report will be available?

Mr. Smith: I did reference this earlier, but we are at arm's length–so the gov­ern­ment of Manitoba is at arm's length from the Auditor General. So, I wouldn't want to prejudge the–anything that the–or, question anything that the Auditor General and his office is undergoing–under­taking.

* (16:00)

      But I do say, and I say this in all honesty and seriousness, that our gov­ern­ment takes the recom­men­dations and the findings of the Auditor General very seriously. Always have and always will. And I know that all members in this Chamber would agree with me on that and take that same approach; that the Auditor General is in­de­pen­dent by its very nature and not–the position itself is in­de­pen­dent by its very nature, that office is in­de­pen­dent by its very nature and im­por­tant to be so, that it's free of inter­ference from gov­ern­ment.

      And so, I do look forward to the–to working with munici­palities and working with them on any issues that they have, parti­cularly the ones outlined by the Auditor General.

Ms. Naylor: Certainly ap­pre­ciate the work of the Auditor General's de­part­ment and, as a long-standing member of the Public Accounts Com­mit­tee, I have learned a great deal about the de­part­ments and gov­ern­ment as a result of those reports. And I really ap­pre­ciate that work.

      My question for the minister is: Does he hope for there to be broader lessons for administrative gov­ern­ance for munici­palities that come from this report?

Mr. Smith: I ask the member if you could repeat the last part of the question, I didn't quite hear it.

Ms. Naylor: Yes, I can.

      Does the minister hope that there will be broader lessons for admin­is­tra­tive gov­ern­ance for munici­palities that come from this report?

Mr. Smith: Of course, any time an Auditor General report comes out and–with a list of recom­men­dations or findings, I think it's im­por­tant for every gov­ern­ment to take that as a learning op­por­tun­ity. There's always room for im­prove­ment and there's always room for growth, and I think that's the whole point of this Auditor General, is learn as you go.

      And we know that, as times change and issues change and challenges change, so, too, do the nature–in this parti­cular case, the nature of munici­pal gov­ern­ance changes. So, I would say that it's a continuous learning ability and learning program for us, as the Province.

      And, of course, like I said before, the Auditor General, we do take that seriously, we take their findings very seriously and we'll continue to work with munici­palities to make sure that they are–they're in compliance and that they are able to govern and represent their residents and con­stit­uents in a way that certainly would be more than satisfactory to the Auditor General and his staff.

Ms. Naylor: I just have a final question.

      I had the op­por­tun­ity to ask a number of questions about the Fire Com­mis­sioner during Estimates, but one that I missed asking is: Can the minister tell the com­mit­tee why the gov­ern­ment decided to end the special operating agency status of the Office of the Fire Com­mis­sioner, and what were the issues that led to that decision and what im­prove­ments have been made by bringing this former S.O.A. into gov­ern­ment as part of the de­part­ment?

Mr. Smith: To answer the member opposite's question, and I know that some of that–the reason would have been because the gov­ern­ment did do some­thing very similar to other special operating agencies across gov­ern­ment.

Ms. Naylor: That was my last question, Mr. Chair, but it wasn't fully answered.

      So, the second part of that question is: What im­prove­ments have been made by bringing this former S.O.A. into gov­ern­ment as part of the de­part­ment?

Mr. Smith: That would really–for ongoing learning op­por­tun­ities, really.

      We, as a gov­ern­ment, are continuously learning from decisions made. And any decisions that we do make we continue to monitor and make sure that the intended outcome is what we had hoped and anticipated.

Mr. Dougald Lamont (St. Boniface): I was just–I was going to ask a question of the Minister of Families (Ms. Squires), if possible. I know that we're near the end of session.

      I know the minister has received an interim report on The Link. There was supposed to be a third party–I understand Deloitte was doing it. The minister has received an in­de­pen­dent–an interim report.

      I was wondering if there was any update on when it might be released.

Hon. Rochelle Squires (Minister of Families): I'll be certain to update the member as well as this entire House when that report is ready to be revealed.

Mr. Lamont: Yes, thank you.

Just a question for the Minister of Justice (Mr. Goertzen). I know that in November, we asked for–whether it would be possible–I understand that there were Crown prosecutors coming from Saskatchewan to look into why charges in–against Peter Nygård had never been laid in Manitoba.

      I was just wondering if he can–I know that I've asked about this before, and it's not that we want to–is there any timeline when we might be able to expect a report on that, as well?

Mr. Goertzen: My under­standing is that prosecutions in Saskatchewan has completed their report and provided it to Manitoba prosecutions and they're currently reviewing it. And my ex­pect­a­tion is that we'll be able to speak further about that relatively shortly.

Mr. Lamont: Yes, just one more question. It's about–I know that there's a very–a very exciting project has been proposed for the revitalization of Portage Place, and the Pan Am Clinic is part of it.

      I understand–I'm just trying to understand that Dr. Peter MacDonald's–the head of the wait times task force–is involved with the Pan Am Clinic. I'm just wondering, how did–how does this work in terms of, how did Shared Health and the owner of the Pan Am Clinic navigate this–being part of this deal, while also provi­ding advice to gov­ern­ment based on the wait times?

      I'm just–my concern here is just about the in­de­pen­dence of the in–the task force on–be in­de­pen­dent, and I'm just wondering if there's an issue there with the perceived in­de­pen­dence of the wait times task force with Mr. MacDonald being–or, Dr. MacDonald being part of the–this proposed deal?

Mr. Chairperson: Just before I recog­nize whichever minister wishes to speak, just for the clarity of the House, just checking a rule on the nature of question rotation for this section. This is obviously a little bit different to how things normally operate, and want to make that sure that we're abiding by the rules, also that everybody who wants to ask questions is–will get their turn. So, I–just checking procedure on that and will endeavour to do things the right way.

      I think we are, but if we're not, we'll adjust.

* (16:10)

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister of Finance): Just clarifying the question for the member–from the member for St. Boniface (Mr. Lamont).

      And the member is correct, Mr.–Dr. MacDonald is certainly associated with the Pan Am Clinic. He's also willingly agreed to chair the–to the com­mit­tee on the diag­nos­tic and surgical task force.

      And, I will say, we looked at an expansion of the Pan Am Clinic. And, you know, during that discussion about an expansion of the Pan Am Clinic, the con­ver­sa­tion around a potential redevelopment of downtown Portage Place came up. So, it seemed–you know, obviously, Dr. MacDonald is involved on that side and then offered his advice and expertise on the project downtown, as well.

      Clearly, True North were an integral part of those con­ver­sa­tions, and through that dialogue, clearly, Shared Health had to be an integral part of the con­ver­sa­tion. As well, the WRHA was an im­por­tant part of those con­ver­sa­tions.

      So, it really was a matter, when we looked at the expansion of Pan Am and then we looked at what could happen for downtown and downtown revital­ization. So, quite frankly, we got all of those players around the table to have the initial con­ver­sa­tion and it–the con­ver­sa­tion grew from there.

MLA Tom Lindsey (Flin Flon): So, I have a couple of questions specific to health in the North.

      The first question I have is in regards to air ambulance and cost renumeration. I'm not sure if the minister's aware that Flin Flon is a border com­mu­nity–border between Manitoba and Saskatchewan runs through the middle of the com­mu­nity–and any number of people get medical attention in Prince Albert or Saskatoon, which are in Saskatchewan, because that's where they have family; it's closer to get to; there's a bunch of reasons.

      So, over a year ago, I had written to the minister and contacted her office about reimbursing an air ambulance cost somewhere in the neighbourhood of $5,000 for someone who had a heart issue, and the local doctor sent him to Saskatoon because that's where his original heart surgery was done, so it made sense to get the follow-up done there. Since that time, I haven't been able to get an answer from the minister. The last time I talked to someone in her de­part­ment and actually spoke to a human was February of 2023.

      Since then, there's another case, a gentleman, same circum­stance: air ambulance bill; flown to Saskatoon for follow-up heart stuff. The last time I spoke to someone in the minister's office, the first case was still under review. I'm not sure I understand why it takes well over a year to review this. Certainly, it's an issue that was covered previously.

      And so I'm wondering if the minister can answer that. Will those air ambulance bills be covered for folks that are, through no choice of their own at the end of the day, sent by a doctor out of province?

Ms. Gordon: I thank the member for the question, and certainly ap­pre­ciate all op­por­tun­ities to talk about our gov­ern­ment's commit­ment to ensuring that Manitobans living in the North receive the health-care services they need.

      Our gov­ern­ment is committed to equitable health-care services, regardless of which region or which com­mu­nity a Manitoban lives in. And when they are required to travel for medical services, our gov­ern­ment is also committed to ensuring that their expenses are covered and are dealt with.

      There is a process through the de­part­ment to recover–to be reimbursed for those expenses. And I agree; it should be done in a timely manner, and where expenses are not going to be reimbursed, an individual should be provided with an explanation and the reasons for that. But our gov­ern­ment, indeed, remains committed to processing reimbursements and ensuring the de­part­ment does so in a timely fashion.

      Now, I'm not aware of each specific case that has been mentioned by the member opposite, but certainly an overall commit­ment by our gov­ern­ment is to enhance critical-care capacity in Manitoba and, as well, in the North.

      Thank you, Mr. Chair.

MLA Lindsey: So, will the minister ensure that those two cases in parti­cular are looked after and that people aren't out of pocket $5,000, which is just going to add to their already stressful situation when they're flown by air ambulance from Flin Flon to Saskatoon, in this case?

      I didn't hear the minister say yes, that that would be looked after, and I have been trying to follow up with the minister's office through multiple phone calls, letters. I did talk to her assist­ant in February of this year. Since that time, no one ever gets back to me.

      So, can the minister answer simply yes or no, and preferably yes?

Ms. Gordon: I ap­pre­ciate the follow-up question from the member opposite with regard to his con­stit­uents.

      I will certainly take this back to my office and have discussions about–I don't have the names or the particulars related to the cases he's brought forward. You know, we do say quite often that discussing specific cases on the floor of the Legislature, that is not the place to do that. The member has said he has brought this forward to my office, and I will certainly–I commit to the member that I will take this back and have discussions with my staff, as well as with the de­part­ment.

      I–the criteria for reimbursement of air ambulance services is applied to each case on its own merit, and it's certainly not decided by myself or here in the Manitoba Legis­lative Building. But as the minister respon­si­ble, I commit to looking into the cases that the member has brought forward today, and I thank the member for advocating on behalf of his con­stit­uents.

      Thank you, Mr. Chair.

MLA Lindsey: I ap­pre­ciate that the minister has committed to looking into it.

      One of these cases, someone in her de­part­ment has been looking into it for over a year now. I don't think it should take that excessive amount of time to come up with the right answer. So, can the minister give me an idea of how long it's going to take her to come up with the answer to these cases?

      People are worried. People are financially stressed because of this. It shouldn't have to come out of their own pockets. And if there is a policy in place that covers it, it shouldn't take this long to get an answer.

      So, can the minister tell me how long it's going to take for her to come up with the answer?

Ms. Gordon: In follow-up to the member's question, I commit to taking his inquiry back to my office and back to Manitoba Health.

      This is–it's not standard. He has said–and I can't verify, but I'll take–certainly take his word for it–that it has been over a year for one of those cases. That is out of the ordinary, and I certainly want to delve further into these two cases and what might be delaying either a reply or reimbursement to the patients in question.

* (16:20)

      And I agree with the member that we certainly don't want Manitobans to be out of pocket, and the stress of having to wait long periods of time to receive an answer or reimbursement. And so, I commit again to the member that I will raise this with my office and with Manitoba Health.

      Thank you, Mr. Chair.

MLA Lindsey: Thank the minister for that.

      One of the other issues that's been taking place in Flin Flon is relating to seniors' dental care. We have one senior that has mobility issues and some cognitive issues, and because we don't do surgeries in Flin Flon anymore, trying to get someone to take care of her broken teeth has proved problematic. And just keeping a senior doped up on painkillers clearly isn't the answer.

      And now I have another senior without means who has broken a tooth and, in fact, only has six teeth left. Had a top plate since she was 15, doesn't have private insurance.

      So, can someone tell me how those seniors should get the dental care that they should be entitled to? Because it's not classified as an insured service, they don't have private insurance, can't get surgeries in Flin Flon anymore.

      So, could someone tell me how those seniors should get the care they're entitled to?

Hon. Scott Johnston (Minister of Seniors and Long-Term Care): I'm aware of the–one of the issues that the member had brought forward some time back in regards to–excuse me–in regards to dental service for an individual who had, certainly, some issues.

      Did further pursue that with Northern Health, and it was my under­standing that Northern Health did do some further in­vesti­gation and the individual in question was also, too, brought to Winnipeg for some further health care, and the issue was further dealt with.

      But I can't say as the ultimate result, because that really is with the De­part­ment of Health and the health author­ity that looks after that parti­cular area. So, I would indicate that inquiries had been made; it was my under­standing that further follow-up with the individual took place.

      In answer to the member's question in regards to overall dental health of seniors, I know that that was an issue that was brought forward when we did our seniors strategy discussions. And our de­part­ment continues to review areas of need within the North, as well as everywhere else in the province of Manitoba.

      So, I–you know, I–in order to give you a general answer to your question, I can't do that. What I can do is I can look into specifics based on the infor­ma­tion that's provided, and follow those up with the De­part­ment of Health.

      So, if there's another situation that the member wants to bring forward with some detail, be happy to look at each individual issue as individual issues.

Mr. Chairperson: Are there any further questions?

      Seeing none, is the com­mit­tee ready for the question?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Mr. Chairperson: Shall the motion pass? [Agreed]

      This concludes the busi­ness before us.

      Com­mit­tee rise.

      Call in the Speaker.

IN SESSION

Committee Report

Mr. Andrew Micklefield (Chairperson): Madam Speaker, the Com­mit­tee of Supply has adopted a motion regarding concurrence in Supply.

      Therefore, I move, seconded by the honourable member for McPhillips (Mr. Martin), that the report of the com­mit­tee be received.

Motion agreed to.

Concurrence Motion

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Justice and Attorney General): Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Minister of Finance, that this House concur in the report of the Com­mit­tee of Supply respecting concurrence and all Supply reso­lu­tions relating to the Estimates of expenditure for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024.

Motion agreed to.

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Government House Leader): I'm seeking leave of the House to not see the clock until all stages of the ap­pro­priation act have been completed, including royal assent.

Madam Speaker: Is there leave to not see the clock until we've proceeded through all the stages and royal assent? [Agreed]

Supply Motion

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister of Finance): I move, seconded by the Minister of Justice, that there be granted to His Majesty for the Public Service for the Province for the fiscal year ending March 31st, 2024, out of the Consolidated Fund, the sums of $16,802,673,000, as set out in part A, Operating Expenditure; and $1,002,855,000, as set out in part B, Capital Invest­ment; and $494,794,000, as set out in part C, Loans and Guarantees; and $913,907,000, as set out in part D, Capital Invest­ments, by other reporting entities of the Estimates.

Motion agreed to.

Introduction of Bills

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister of Finance): Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Minister of Labour  and Immigration (Mr. Reyes), that Bill 42, The Appro­priation Act, 2023, be now read a first time and be ordered for second reading imme­diately.

Motion agreed to.

Second Readings

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister of Finance): Madam Speaker, I move, seconded by the Minister of Health (Ms. Gordon), that Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023, be now read a second time and be referred to Com­mit­tee of the Whole.

Motion presented.

Mr. Cullen: This bill is intended to provide expend­iture author­ity for the amount shown in the Manitoba Estimates of Expenditures for 2023-24.

      Madam Speaker, this budget provides historic health for Manitobans, and it also provides record invest­ments in services for Manitobans all across gov­ern­ment.

      Thank you.

Madam Speaker: Do members wish to ask questions of the bill?

      If there are no questions, is there any members wishing to debate the bill?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Madam Speaker: Is the House ready for the question?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Madam Speaker: It has been moved by the hon­our­able Minister of Finance, seconded by the hon­our­able Minister of Health (Ms. Gordon), that Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023, be now read a second time and be referred to the Com­mit­tee of the Whole.

      Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Agreed? [Agreed]

      The House will now resolve into Com­mit­tee of the Whole to consider and report on Bill 42, The  Appro­priation Act, 2023, for concurrence and third reading.

      Mr. Deputy Speaker, please take the Chair.

Committee of the Whole

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Mr. Chairperson (Andrew Micklefield): The Com­mit­tee of the Whole will come to order to consider Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023.

      Does the minister respon­si­ble for Bill 42 have an opening statement?

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister of Finance): Bill 42 provides spending author­ity for the de­part­ments of gov­ern­ment for the 2023-24 fiscal year as set out in the Manitoba Estimates of Expenditure, which were tabled in the Legislature on the 7th day of March, 2023.

      And I will reiterate, this legis­lation provides historic assist­ance for Manitobans and also provides record invest­ments across government to support gov­ern­ment services on behalf of Manitobans.

      Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Some Honourable Members: Oh, oh.

Mr. Chairperson: Order, please.

      We thank the minister.

      Does the critic from the official op­posi­tion have an opening statement?

      Seeing no statement, does the hon­our­able–[interjection]

      We will now, then, begin clause-by-clause con­sid­era­tion of the bill. During the con­sid­era­tion of this bill, the enacting clause and the title are postponed until all other clauses have been considered in their proper order.

      Clause 1–pass; clause 2–pass; clause 3–pass; clause 4–pass; clause 5–pass; clause 6–pass; clause 7–pass; clause 8–pass; clause 9–pass; clause 10–pass; schedule–pass; enacting clause–pass; title–pass. Bill be reported.

      That concludes the busi­ness before us.

      Com­mit­tee rise.

      Call in the Speaker.

* (16:40)

IN SESSION

Committee Report

Mr. Andrew Micklefield (Chairperson): The Com­mit­tee of the Whole has considered the following: Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023, and reports the same without amend­ment.

      I move, seconded by the hon­our­able member for Kildonan-River East (Mrs. Cox), that the report of the com­mit­tee be received.

Motion agreed to.

Concurrence and Third Readings

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Hon. Cliff Cullen (Minister of Finance): I move, seconded by the Minister of Edu­ca­tion, that Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023, reported from the Com­mit­tee of the Whole, be concurred in and be now read for a third time and passed.

Motion presented.

Mr. Cullen: I will conclude my remarks on this bill today.

      The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023, provides historic help for Manitobans. It provides historic tax reduc­tions for hard-working Manitobans. This budget also includes record invest­ments for the services that Manitobans have come to rely on and have come to expect. This budget provides increases in every de­part­ment across gov­ern­ment.

      Madam Speaker, I look forward to the passing of this im­por­tant legis­lation.

Madam Speaker: Is it the pleasure–[interjection] Oh, yes.

      The hon­our­able member for River Heights, to debate the bill.

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): I thought there would be somebody from the official op­posi­tion, but I at least want to rise and make a few comments.

      We're now coming to the end of the budget process. We'll have it completed fairly soon. We have major concerns with the overall budget process, as we have outlined in the debate that has led up to this, and I just wanted to put those on the record, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: Are there any further members wishing to speak in debate?

      Is the House ready for the question, then?

Some Honourable Members: Question.

Madam Speaker: The question before the House is Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023.

      Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion? Agreed?

Some Honourable Members: Agreed.

Some Honourable Members: No.

Madam Speaker: I hear a no.

Voice Vote

Madam Speaker: All those in favour of the motion, please say yea.

Some Honourable Members: Yea.

Madam Speaker: All those opposed, please say nay.

Some Honourable Members: Nay.

Madam Speaker: In my opinion, the Yeas have it.

Recorded Vote

Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Government House Leader): A recorded vote, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker: A recorded vote having been called, call in the members.

* (17:00)

      The question before the House is Bill 42, The   Appro­priation Act, 2023. All those–[interjection]–oh, concurrence and third reading of Bill 42, The Ap­pro­priation Act, 2023.

Division

A RECORDED VOTE was taken, the result being as follows:

Yeas

Clarke, Cox, Cullen, Eichler, Ewasko, Goertzen, Gordon, Guenter, Guillemard, Helwer, Isleifson, Johnson, Johnston, Khan, Klein, Lagassé, Lagimodiere, Martin, Michaleski, Micklefield, Morley‑Lecomte, Nesbitt, Pedersen, Piwniuk, Reyes, Schuler, Smith (Lagimodière), Smook, Squires, Stefanson, Teitsma, Wharton, Wishart, Wowchuk.

Nays

Altomare, Asagwara, Brar, Bushie, Gerrard, Lamoureux, Lindsey, Maloway, Moses, Naylor, Redhead, Sala, Sandhu, Wasyliw, Wiebe.

Clerk (Ms. Patricia Chaychuk): Yeas 34, Nays 15.

Madam Speaker: The motion is accordingly passed.

* * *

Madam Speaker: The House will now prepare for royal assent.

Royal Assent

Deputy Sergeant-at-Arms (Mr. Cam Steel): Her Honour the Lieutenant Governor.

Her Honour Anita R. Neville, Lieutenant Governor of the Province of Manitoba, having entered the House and being seated on the throne, Madam Speaker addressed Her Honour the Lieutenant Governor in the following words:

Madam Speaker: Your Honour:

      The Legislative Assembly of Manitoba asks Your Honour to accept the following bill:

* (17:10)

Clerk Assistant (Ms. Vanessa Gregg):

      Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023; Loi de 2023 portant affectation de crédits

Clerk (Ms. Patricia Chaychuk): In His Majesty's name, the Lieutenant Governor of the Province of Manitoba thanks the Legislative Assembly and assents to this bill.

Her Honour was then pleased to retire.

* * *

Madam Speaker: The hour being past 5 p.m., this House is adjourned and stands adjourned until 1:30 p.m. tomorrow.


 


LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA

Tuesday, May 23, 2023

CONTENTS


Vol. 58b

ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS

Introduction of Bills

Bill 41–The Occupiers' Liability Amendment Act

Goertzen  2541

Bill 43–The Provincial Offences Amendment Act (2)

Goertzen  2541

Ministerial Statements

Khalsa Aid Food Drive

Khan  2541

Brar 2542

Gerrard  2543

Members' Statements

John Taylor Collegiate

Johnston  2543

MACY Report Recommendations

B. Smith  2543

Election Campaigning

Martin  2544

Jason Butchart

Altomare  2544

Mineral Industry and Economic Reconciliation

Lamont 2545

Oral Questions

Manitoba Public Insurance–Project Nova

Kinew   2546

Stefanson  2546

Health-Care Services

Kinew   2547

Stefanson  2547

Health-Care Services

Asagwara  2548

Gordon  2548

Brandon School Board Meeting

Naylor 2549

Khan  2549

Squires 2550

Education System

Altomare  2551

Ewasko  2551

Manitoba Hydro Rates

Sala  2552

Cullen  2552

Manitoba Public Insurance

Lamont 2553

Goertzen  2553

Shaw Internet and TV Prices

Gerrard  2553

Squires 2553

Brandon Police and Bear Clan

Isleifson  2554

Goertzen  2554

York Factory Cree Nation

Redhead  2554

Morley-Lecomte  2554

Petitions

Punjabi Bilingual Programs in Public Schools

Altomare  2554

Louise Bridge

Maloway  2555

ORDERS OF THE DAY

(Continued)

GOVERNMENT BUSINESS

Committee of Supply

Legislative Assembly

Driedger 2556

Fontaine  2557

Goertzen  2558

Gerrard  2559

Committee Report

Micklefield  2559

Committee of Supply

Concurrence Motion

Goertzen  2559

Moses 2560

Teitsma  2560

Guillemard  2561

Wharton  2561

Marcelino  2561

Gordon  2561

Asagwara  2562

Goertzen  2563

Squires 2564

Naylor 2566

A. Smith  2566

Lamont 2568

Squires 2568

Cullen  2569

Lindsey  2569

Johnston  2570

Committee Report

Micklefield  2571

Concurrence Motion

Goertzen  2571

Supply Motion

Cullen  2571

Introduction of Bills

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Cullen  2571

Second Readings

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Cullen  2571

Committee of the Whole

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Cullen  2572

Committee Report

Micklefield  2572

Concurrence and Third Readings

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023

Cullen  2572

Gerrard  2573

Royal Assent

Bill 42–The Appropriation Act, 2023  2573